Yes Robert....your allusion to who was paying the rent while this 'lucky' lady was discovering her 'true artistic self' gets right to one crucial point. Quite obviously she did not have to make a living while performing her solo spiritual exploration. ...but for those of us artists who live in the real world, teaching can be a real and available, positive key to survival.

It is important to say GOOD teaching is about getting outside of your own self indulgent ego and developing real empathy with other artists who are often struggling to make their art say the things they want it to say. Independant teaching does not deplete you as a teacher .....that only happens if you are teaching within a school system which demands measurable outcomes. If you are teaching independantly you will most likely 'teach best what you most need to learn'!!!.....this is not a down side...it's a real positive for your own learning and an incredible chance for you to grow through helping others to grow their own art.

I feel very sad when people say that teaching depletes your creativity. That is not a given...it is a function of the WAY you teach. Teaching art a few days a week can be the greatest gift that you ever give yourself....the gift of understanding, humility, and best of all your students will teach you many things you would never find on your own.

I often come home at 10pm after a vibrant class and I am fired up so much I cant sleep so of course I work off that energy in my studio. Yes my students have pointed me to some of the greatest discoveries I have made in my own art and after 30 years of full time art practice I have a lot to be thankful for. Most of all I am greatful for the wonderful people art has introduced into my life!! .....None of whom I would have met closeted in the safety and delusion of my own safe studio. .......I say TRY teaching others....you just may learn something :))))

Teaching art gives me energy and inspiration. My youngest students, ages four and up, teach me each day about the craft and art of teaching itself. Every class is a fresh, instructive experience for me. My senior students bring curiosity, genuine yearning to make art and great appreciation for life's gifts of time and good fortune. Their learning experiences inspire me. I cannot imagine having lived a life without the thousands of students I have taught. There are times I wish I had more time for personal art exploration but I wouldn't trade the classroom for the lonely agony of my studio!

I have been " teaching " art on a full and part time basis -but it was never what one calls teaching -I was -and am -but a coach -and it has never taken energy away from my work as an artist.
And one can always see new things within the team

I've been an art student since early retirement 12 years ago. Have been fortunate to have several different teachers and am grateful to each for what they had to offer me as I learned. Recently I've finally found my own "voice". One of my first teachers told me I would learn from alot of people along the way and then sort of throw all that away at some point and become an artist. I really didn't understand what she was saying at the time. I do now. So, my thanks to all artists who are willing to share and teach so that people like me can find our own voice.

While I hate public speaking and am really, really bad at it, I love teaching art. It's so great to be able to give people the tools to do something wonderful! I always learn a lot from other artists. The only thing that gets me down is when people are convinced that they are doing badly or are unable to make anything good.

I don't understand how teaching is giving away your creativity! Does that mean giving away time or ideas? You can give students a map, but they're going to have to walk the road themselves. Even if they imitate the teacher's style, it's going to come out different.

Another in Anonymity - what was selfish about deciding not to teach when you knew you would be poor at it? Instead, that was unselfish of you!
There are too many teachers (of any subject) who are not good at teaching, who therefore are doing more damage than good, often destroying a student's initial interest in a subject. Haven't we all experienced a bad teacher some time in our lives?
If you are good at doing something you are not obliged to teach it!

So you had another source of income; that was fortunate. It has been assumed you are female, and a "kept" woman - some assumption!
Even if you are female, and maybe had a husband happy to support you while you followed your passion, that is your business. You didn't waste that opportunity; you made full use of it, and I am sure gave the supporter great satisfaction for having been able to help.

And an artist who has to support himself can find ways other than teaching to do so; he doesn't have to teach art!

Good and great teachers are a treasure much sought after. Even a teacher who teaches things you already "know" still has inspiration and ideas for the student. As one progresses further and later into ones art career, it seems to become a give and take, where you could teach the course yourself, but yet you still want to be the student. Nevertheless, I do not believe that foolish statement about those who do, do, those who can't do teach. The last line of that statement could be true, those who can't do or teach...criticise. Or rather, won't try, so they criticise.
I am trying to work up the skill to teach! I have a vast area of experience, but teaching is a talent and skill needed. Not to mention confidence.
Keep going all you wonderful teachers!

I have been teaching for about 12 to 13 years. It has been the most wonderful experience. As many have already said, those students that came my way are part of my life. I would not have had them if I had not done this teaching. They have become part of my family. And, they don't paint like me! They have been taught many of the principles that will keep them learning even if they never take from another teacher. I have allowed them to go their own way, but with good basics.

But, having said this, I do feel like it saps some of my creative energy. Planning and conducting the classes takes time, if you do it well. Funnily since you have sent this letter, it comes at a time when I have made a decision to take a breather from teaching weekly classes. I will continue to teach mini-workshops near home and regular workshops around the country. I made this decision because I felt drained and wanted to use my energies to be in the studio more without "teaching" entering into what I do. I want to stop analyzing what I am doing. I want to paint more from the gut. I have internalized many good lessons. A wonderful teacher told me just lately to learn all you can and then forget it and just paint! Good words for me at this time.

I don't negate the good that comes from teaching, but there comes a time when it needs to take a back seat to my own work and my intuition. What a surprise to find this letter just at a time when I have been struggling with the issue of teaching or not. Yes, it will seriously cut into my income, but hopefully I will produce more and better work and that will up the income! Thanks Robert!

This topic really gets me going.
The best way to grab students attention and respect, is to demonstrate the discipline being taught. In teaching, an artist who can demonstrate the content of the curriculum with skill, talent and knowledge does more to imbue students with understanding, than any theoretical approach.

When I stood before my adult students at Sheridan Collegiate, in Brampton, the very first demonstration I gave, surprised me more than my students. Before the (Life drawing) demo, the class had the usual low hum of a distracted casual gathering. I sat upon a low sketching seat for figurative drawing; they all gathered behind, to peer over my shoulder, and fell silent. I'm not the greatest figure drawer of present times, but my speed, accuracy of proportion and understanding of the human form became obvious to each student. I knew my subject, and demonstrated my ability. They got what they paid for, in that lesson, by observation.

I still have my Teacher Evaluation forms from 1991. On it is written "Doug, Excellent Evaluation", by the Director of Sheridan. Ultimately the students rate the teacher. The proof is in the "Putting".

As art classes go, one must "give good demo". There can be no respect, nor real learning without it. The trade-off may be in the balance of teaching and ability. One can be a great artist but a poor teacher. The converse may hold, but even good teachers cannot teach good art, if they are inept artists.

I have attended places of high learning, and realized, sometimes, my talent exceeded the instructors'. But to be a good teacher, one must be a good student first. I listened for jewels of insight. If the talent was lacking, perhaps there was excitement, enthusiasm or wonder emitting from that teacher. This, was good enough for me, if I often went home thinking of better ways of making my art.


Doug MacBean
Hamilton ON

http://www.dougmacbean.com/

..i know ALOT about this subject .....but I DO love sharing my knowledge and experience with others. I believe it is a privelege.
However....its the study of time control and usage plus keeping your own spirit alive as well......heh heh not always good at either btw......hopefully I am listening to my own words

I have found that while I am teaching, I am also being taught. I teach mostly home schooled students in my home studio. This is the joy of my life. When my students catch on, and the joy they experience in their own accomplishments is enough to inspire me on to greater things. I start my students at the beginning. In my opinion, the beginning is drawing! we do four (4) sessions (each session is six (6) lessons long) on drawing alone. We then venture into color, with the color wheel being the first lesson. My students usually stay in my classes until they are very good artists - some graduate high school and go onto college. I have thought many times of just taking that time and spend more time on my painting, but I find that the Spring and Summer are my times to paint. When I teach, I don't paint as much, but do a lot of drawing and thinking and planning for my "time."

When I was first teaching, it did indeed take perhaps too much of my creativity, while at the same time it informed and shaped how I now work! I quit teaching for a while to get my own art making & selling to the next level, then found myself with an opportunity to develop my teaching skills & try again. Now my own work is my main focus & I enjoy part-time status (one or two classes) at a local community college - the perfect balance for me, too. ;)

I decided not to teach art by the time I was 12 years old. I believed that I would jeopardize time and energy for a career as a painter. Finally, at age 63, after many years as a painter and studying art mostly on my own, I decided to teach after all since after the economic downturn I needed the income. Something very strange happened. Teaching energized my painting beyond anything I could have imagined. I suddenly started painting in oils, I suddenly started painting animals and human portraits, all a huge departure from my watercolor landscapes. Not only that, my income has soared. I am a good teacher with many years of experience teaching in another field. I hope I am not teaching my students bad habits- I think their results speak volumes and my happiness with teaching and painting tells me I have found my most authentic self. I have never felt more coherent.

Feeling a little comfortable Robert? "this writer is making a point while not mentioning who paid the rent while he or she was concentrating on improvement" if he \ she is living on an average artists wage you must have made them feel,so good about the struggle. Teaching is a job designed for teachers

I began teaching after twenty years of painting. I have found that articulating a concept or showing my students why a great painting is great clarifies my own understanding of painting. It's like thinking out loud. I do find it draining at times and instead of trying to explain how to paint, I just want to hurry back to the studio and paint.

You need to add, pious, and pompous to poisonous pedagogy.

I would like to add something -- I did demonstrate most every class. And, students were very insistent that they could come to class to only watch a demo. They knew the value of painting in class, so I could assess what they were doing at that time. But, many times they would say to keep working on the demonstration because they were learning as much or more from the demo as from me walking around and discussing what they are doing. And, sometimes when I struggled with the demo, they would say it was the best lesson ever -- because they were allowed to watch what I would try to fix the problem. Sometimes I would even ask for their suggestions. They loved it.

Yes, I was energized by teaching. Yes, it did help my work. And, yes, I have some students that have gone on to gallery representation and winning awards. But, also I have many students that now paint for the love of it. My favorite saying is "It's the journey, not the destination". So, last August when I had a solo show with over 100 paintings, I named it "It's the Journey!".

I once received a phone call from someone from continuing education after they had been to see a watercolor show of mine. I was asked to teach an adult watercolor class. I replied with I am not a teacher. With that I was told I don't want a teacher, I want an artist. I taught watercolor for twelve years after that and that was an education in itself.

Don't we all wish we'd had good instruction when learning to paint! I did not have that luxury, not having a lot of money to travel to a good school, if one existed. Indeed, so few existed in the world of abstract expressionism where your art had to be "new under the sun" or it was not valid. Discouraged and then disgusted, I studied music instead, and learned art from books (the 25 year learning curve).

I am passionate about providing good training for artists, precisely because I didn't have good training. I know the recurring pain of struggling, doubting, dreaming of being an artist.

Here are some things I feel make for a good art teacher. The optimal art instructor should:
1. Be a working professional artist, not just a teacher.
2. If your work is abstract in orientation, be able to show you can paint fruit, trees, portraits. If Degas and Picasso could paint nice portraits in their early years, shouldn't we? Guess what: Your students most likely want to paint representationally, at least for now.
3. Use demonstration to communicate more often than words.
4. Teach fundamentals, simply, sequentially, being able to clearly explain your method. I personally believe that without solid technical ability (being able to quickly and accurately paint whatever I see,) my ability to create real art (technique + spirit = real art) will not happen.
5. If I cannot condense my instruction into simple 1,2,3-style lessons, with quick, clear demonstrations, then I may in fact not know what I am doing.
6. I believe that technique can be taught, however turning technique into art (the infusion and expression of your spirit and technique) is best facilitated, not directed. A student needs to find their own path, which is largely intuitive. My goal is to offer them direction, then await the creation of the artist-in-the-making. After learning some foundational technique, I try to facilitate the growth of their artistic spirit by exposing them to books, prints, galleries, psychological ideas, emotions, symbols, etc. From this, they slowly create their own path, upon which their spirit can walk without my help.

7. If I don't do these things, I should recognize that my goal is not the growth of the competently creative student;rather I should admit that I just want to make money off of them, or worse, to turn them into clones of myself. (An artist's dream is infinitely more important than a teacher's ego.)

Like a butterfly with a broken wing, an art student should be nurtured and trained, then encouraged to fly away to be the best and most beautiful butterfly in the sky. I've never met an artist whose spirit didn't want to fly.

I hope this helps someone out there.
You can see what I do at www.thecreativetraveler.org or www.hollandgallery.com

I am going into my 29th year of teaching and must say that it has brought me more joy and inspiration than anything else on the planet. I agree with Steve M...a really good session with a group of active learners can absolutely stoke your artistic fire! With that said, I also believe it depends on how and where and what you teach. I decided early on in my dual-careers that I did not want to teach in the public school sector because most do not support the arts (in my experience.) This is so unfortunate since there are many eager, talented students that would flourish and prosper in art careers if they only had support. I also do not teach everyday...I bless those that do because that is a HARD job, especially if you must follow a core curriculum set-up by non-artist-minded people and systems (and they usually are) that don't allot you the funds or materials to teach a proper art class. I have always been able to find private institutions and organizations that welcome good art instruction and are willing to pay for it and I think, for me, the key was to always teach what I wanted to learn and provide examples and demos of what I was teaching to show the students that I was a working/exhibiting artist. I myself never had much respect for a teacher that didn't produce a few samples of what they were working on. Teaching isn't a job to take lightly ...it is a calling and a life-long commitment (even long after you retire from it!) I was just made the god-parent of a baby belonging to one of my first second-grade students all those many years ago! Teaching is wondrous!

P.S. I became a teacher because of a great and nurturing high school art teacher, Hans Rietenbach. Several of my student assistants are now teaching as well, and the mother of my new god-baby...she also became a teacher. And so it goes...

*sigh* Why do artists engage in this debate and other professions do not? A teacher is someone who simply knows more or something different than the student being instructed. Must a high school chemistry teacher hold the Nobel prize to teach students? Must a college English professor have written an acclaimed literary masterpiece to pass on knowledge? Are there no gifted physics teachers other than Einstein?
I submit teaching, regardless of subject, is an unselfish pursuit. It is a desire to influence, impart knowledge, to give of oneself's accumulated wisdom in a given field. It has nothing to do with ego, and little to do with making a living. There are certainly other things that pay more.
May we quit snapping at our peers over a futile controversy? God bless the teachers or none of us would have progressed past crayons and scribbling.

You have finally found a subject that I has both piqued my interest and enraged my sensibilities! I am an artist who teaches. I teach Beginning Watercolours, Intermediate Watercolours and Advanced Watercolours as well as Drawing for the Love of It and a new class in Art History. I have been teaching for over 19 years and painting, selling and exhibiting my work for 30. I am basically self taught, although I first took classes at a local college. I have taught for this same college - in the credit course for 14 years as well as at community schools, prestigious art institutions and seniors organizations. I also teach advanced classes in my home studio as well as run 'plein air' workshops. I am well travelled having taken a dozen painting trips around the world.
I enjoy painting and teaching. I find that when I am not teaching I am often looking after my family and doing household chores. It is these chores that take up my personal painting time!
Teaching affords me a way to stay connected to the best things about painting - reaching people through my art. With watercolours it is too easy to forget the beauty of what the paint can do in a basic wash by trying too hard to make paintings more sophisticated. Many of my beginnings in my classes are so fresh and lovely I often am inspired to finish them. There is the continued joy I receive throughout the years when I meet up with formed students who still praise my teaching. I often hear from my current students that they learned nothing from other teachers who have the attitude of your latest blinkered fan. Don't give away all your secrets! Why would anyone want to encourage the image that there is a mystery to being an artist! What a pile of crap! You should know better than to encourage artists to keep this antiquated old wives tale attitude alive. Along with it goes the attitude that the average person doesn't know anything about art or it's mysteries and therefore it is above them to buy it or enjoy it. This is so bad for all of us and the future of art. Already we see art being eliminated in schools and in public spaces. Why? Certainly this pathetic attitude of some artists to promote their own narrow minded, obstructive, mysterious attitude, is extremely damaging to all of us. I can't believe that you would pass this garbage thinking on to others!
Please clarify your stand on this attitude.

I love your weekly letters, it`s refreshing to hear some gutsy truth for a change, I appreciate your comeback comments. As for the topic on teaching, I had attended an art school in N.Y. back in the 70`s, hoping to receive some form of academic training, when to my surprise half of the teachers couldn't draw themselves. With the continuing ressurgence of atelier traditions and methods finally making headway we are again seeing great art popping up around us. If the so called instructors in our schools haven`t mastered the rudiments of picturemaking these institutions don`t deserve the high tuition they`re asking from young students thirsty for real inspirational education. In my opinion, along with the methods,techniques,main ingredients of art, a good teacher should also share with his students that being committed to this artist life is first and foremost, as in any of the fine arts, there is the art of living it! Thanks again.

When I was in art school, I decided to take a double major in art education.
I thought I was being prudent at the time. When my father found out, he took me for a long walk in the woods. He asked me if I "absolutely PINED to teach children art?" I had to confess that I did not, not even a little bit. I told him I was hedging my bet so that if I couldn't make it in the art world, I would have a career to fall back on. I'll never forget what he told me. He said that I would be doing a disservice to myself AND the children.
That I needed to put all my energy into what I really wanted out of life and leave the teaching to those who had that very special gift.

I am so thankful to the talented teachers who have helped me along the way.
Now, 30 years later, I often get requests to teach workshops or give private lessons. I am not ready to take that path yet. I feel I still have so much to learn. But someday...I hope to repay the many artist/teachers that enlightened my life by passing on that important knowledge.

I've been both an artist and an art teacher and can say that teaching, while it does cut into my time, is the best thing I can do for my art. First, what I teach gets passed along and will be passed through generations, long after I'm gone and this is a form of immortality that is impossible to duplicate. I recently had a show and some of my former students came to the opening to tell me how taking my class had changed the course of their artwork and their lives. Amazing, but I remember telling my best teachers the same thing.
Also, while teaching, I was forced to re-examine certain techniques I had discarded and this changed the nature of my own work, developing in a new and unexpected direction. It's a total win-win for everyone.

i just returned from a unique teaching endeavor. I taught a professional development workshop with twenty teachers from public schools and universities. These teachers made wonderful students. Free from their children both in the class and at home {all were women} they tore into the material like hungry wolves,producing dozens of paintings in the eight hours of studio time. These paintings shimmered with enthusiasm and color, exhibiting an exciting range of styles and marks. My theme was seeing color as value and how that idea frees you from merely describing objects and brings you color freedom. Of course, there is nothing 'new' here but for many in the group, it was a concept that hadn't been demonstrated or stressed. They took to it with gusto. What struck me most was the childlike joy of creation I saw. The room just buzzed with a wonderful energy. I have no doubt these classroom warriors will take away great memories of the experience we shared, that 'mystery' of artmaking we enjoyed together. Teaching and learning can be thrilling when the spirit is right! It's a carnival ride that no one will want to end.

As a high school art teacher who paints in her spare time and in a very concentrated way in the summer, I have to state that both are creative ventures, but occupy very different headspaces. It does take time and separation to go from helping others to develop their abilities to focusing on your own ideas. I am a very committed high school art teacher who has been at it for 22 years. I am one of the lucky ones. I love teaching more now than I ever have and enjoy it more and more each year. However, perhaps the reason is that I see all art students as artists who are simply unfolding in their potential and discovering their abilities with increased practice and exposure to different art forms. My role is help them discover and develop these sides of themselves. The processes I have learned in teaching have had huge effect on my own development as an artist. I often tell my students that I am also learning along with them. I think the greatest thing that I have learned is the structure and nature of disciplining oneself to paint whether you want to or not. The greatest successes in the art world I believe are the ones who do it consistently all the time. They are also the ones that take risks to put their work out in public view to be seen. In teaching I constantly force my students to expose themselves to their peers and believe me this is not easy for teenagers. The trick seems to be creating a safe environment to do that. I always tell them to recognize their greatest strengths as an artist and use those to improve their greatest weaknesses. Once students recognize what their particular strength(s)are, they are not so afraid to expose their art to their peers. I am also fortunate that most of the time I get to see a student develop over a 4 year period. The difference between Grade 9 and 12 is dramatic; and if you can help a student to see and begin to develop their own potential and ability, the rewards are priceless even for your own work!

I awoke this morning to 5 emails from my fledgling site, www.MyArtTutor.com A potential student had weaved her way through my test site, registered, and made a $150 purchase. Even though I have a big 'under construction' sign on the home page, she tested the waters, and commented that her experience was frustrating.

Being as she was the FIRST customer, I comped part of her purchase. (she is the only FIRST).

MyArtTutor was conceived after I wearied of requests for my teaching. I am not teacher material, but realized that I do know many professional tutors who are eager to maintain contact with their students all over the world. Our mission is to provide a means for students to connect and study with tutors they already know, and perhaps meet new ones.

I'm a semi-retired graphic/web designer (?) who is putting the pieces together for a world of students and tutors to come together to share experiences and talents.

thank you so much for giving me permission to use one of your quotes on MyArtTutor's home page. You are an inspiration to all artists!

Who was the teacher of some of my teachers was entirely correct. Essentially we are all self-taught. The business of art teachers is to rescue us from remaining "one of the folk."

Why is untutored art a bad thing? Donald Webster. curator emeritus at the ROM puts it thus: "...most modern folk art is not so much personal expression as it is market-oriented. A contemporary folk artist really ceases to be folk as soon as he or she is discovered (or successfully self-promotes) and becomes commercial. In the realm of paintings...much early and modern folk art is derived or copied from something else." (Canfake, M&S, Toronto, 1996). It's all about originality! I used to copy but haven't for about two decades.

Nova Scotia is heavily inflicted with "poisonous pedagogy" on two fronts: folk art (which does have its teachers) and conceptual art, which doesn't need teachers. Both forms have survived here long after their time.

I speak as a former teacher of physics and biology who never taught art for fear it would spoil the fun. I also speak as a sometime abstractionist, non-objective painter and folk artist. Those forms of my work is still in the after market! It was fun, but as my mother says "Rodney, that was interesting, the first time."

The damning part of a these two approaches to art is the fact that they limit possibilities for thinking and painting. A formal training is never a bad thing provided that a painter eventually breaks the rules proposed by his "betters." Mine hated sunsets and "violent" colour. What about yours?

Being part of an academic Studio Art Program, I am in total agreement with your position(s) on art teachers and teaching. While I have taken classes from "Poisonous" pedagogists, there are, if students of art will dig deeply and long enough and experience as many of the teachers they can think of, wonderful teachers out there. As an advanced student, I am lucky to be working with one who fulfills all of the beneficial requirements. Perhaps I have been twice blessed (or even thrice), and have been fortunate to have worked with exceptional teachers in both oil and watercolor. Of the books that have been recommended by them, I cannot say enough about Robert Henri's "The Art Spirit" and for Edgar Whitney's "Complete Guide to Watercolor Painting." These two books provide that direction or inspiration of the missing onsite teacher.

Regarding the age old conundrum, of doing or teaching art, I feel that entertaining 'all or nothing' thinking doesn't cut it today!
''To the student, the questions are many, to the teacher, few''. ~ Confucius. How would we know anything if someone didn't have the generosity of spirit to pass on knowledge?

Decades ago, I read a brief story about a woman with 11 children. The interviewer asked her ''Ma'am, how do you divide your time and love amongst all those kids?'' Her reply, ''That's just it, I don't divide, I multiply!'' It's not an exclusive 'either/or' world! Artists can do and teach, and reach their highest potential. My experience of studying with MANY of this country's hard working, talented, and commercially successful painters, has left a deep sense of gratitude for their generosity, that can I can pay forward, not only in my work, but in sharing those gifts with others.

Apart from my career as an artist, I am a "teacher of teachers" in the post-secondary system, and I congratulate Anonymous on being brutally honest in his/her self-examination--at least he/she realized that he/she wasn't cut out to teach! I wish more teachers would examine this question before deciding to teach--for the sake of their students. Being a brilliant artist does NOT automatically mean that you are a brilliant teacher. Doing art and explaining it are two different things, requiring quite different skill sets. This is not to say that great artists cannot be great teachers--we've all found those, I hope--but to say that one does not necessarily equate to the other.

And the WORST teacher? The brilliant artist who withholds the "secrets" of their art, wanting only to build up his/her mystique and dependency among the students. These prima donnas often criticize student work harshly, belittle beginners, don't hesitate to paint on top of student work without permission, and maintain a cool distance, refusing to answer questions etc. That's not teaching--that's grandstanding--but there are some artist/"teachers" out there who do just this--shame on them!

I have been teaching for over 50 years and over 25 to the elderly at the Jewish home in California. It is the most gratifying thing I could do ,to see how happy it makes others feel ,and that it takes all of there concentration away from their problems. They look forward to the day I come there and so do I. All of the work helping , also helps me in my work to SEE!! Looking , realizing what the subject is that I'm trying to accomplish and how to get there. With so many to teach, there are many ways to help them and yourself in learning ,which never ends.

Thank you for pointing the importance of passing our experiences, skills, techniques and knowledge as artists to those who deserve it. I have been doing it for some years as a private art monitor not to pay my rent but because of believing in sharing my passion, as part-timer, with the ones who are in need. The result is seeing my students in art college with highest marks and with purpose for life feeling the fulfillments of it. This adds to me the joy of giving and sharing what I have. As I demonstrated in my recent video” Art and speaking one language” I quote” When creating opportunities for people to choose what they love to do and expressing themselves freely, they will not only, master it, but also, will benefit all. To accomplish this, we would need expertise, in every field, to pass on generously, their experiences, passion and love to others. When we master what we do, ARTISTICALLY, this will bring people closer and will eliminate countless hardships to many. Working out of love, will unite the world in a common field of understanding, respect, acknowledgment and care for one another. One does not need to be a brain surgeon to appreciate the art of operating, neither does he/she has to be hungry to learn the art of giving nor do they need to be creative architect to admire the art of architectural. But knowing and experiencing the motives behind everything we do with passion, automatically, will teaches us what it takes to master something. The result will be mutual respect and appreciation will develop leading to unity. In this sense we will be speaking one language through art!”

If you wish to watch the total text in the video please visit this link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aQWzo-kTNZ8

Response to: The Art of Teaching Art, November 13, 2009

A painter’s identity derives from a chosen style of painting, but it also emanates from thoughts about the act of painting itself. Moreover, an artist who chooses to teach ought to feel a fascination with the thinking and learning styles of others. For the artist/teacher this effort requires a willingness to look outward, far beyond the confines of the self. Also helpful is an old-fashioned respect for service to others.

Showing another artist how to reflect on her inner life is a daunting responsibility. To some it can feel like an unfathomably difficult assignment, or worse, a burden. But if nothing surpasses the glory of making contact with another through the alchemical craft of mentoring or leading groups, both of which have engaged me productively for the past thirty years, then teaching is probably the right direction. No other work, save picture-making itself, reveals more about the secrets of the “calling,” or gives a clearer picture of the community of artists laboring so close beside us.

For the working artist/teacher, the issue of balance is crucial. Are you an artist who teaches or a teacher who also paints? The promise I keep to myself is never to teach more than I work at the easel. In this way, painting remains tethered to experience, while pronouncements stay grounded in practice. Retaining the freedom to program your curriculum and, if you’re lucky, where and how you show your work, plays an important role here.

The art of maintaining the professional and emotional equilibrium to turn a life of brush handling into informative counsel requires discipline, skill and a healthy amount of self-awareness. It also takes an unquenchable desire to unearth and share the reasons for pursuing these activities in the first place.

Jakki Kouffman
Santa Fe, New Mexico
www.jakkikouffman.com
art@jakkikouffman.com

Anyone can give feedback on a work, but few can give it in a way that is respectful, useful and encouraging. I say that teaching art is an "art form" of its own, separate from creating art. I hope people who have been able to work with someone who has the fine artistic touch needed to help them will be able to appreciate it.

I was blessed to be able to study with Alexis Celona in Victoria, B.C. Canada. Alexis was a superb cheer-leader, and had the ability to enliven everyone to produce better and better art. She was able to see through the student's vision what was needed in a picture. She never placed her style over yours. She was brilliant at knowing just what was needed for YOU to finish YOUR painting. Her feedback was enlightening and encouraging at the same time. She seemed to revel in our successes.

Without Alexis, I would never have considered becoming a professional artist.

I was delighted to see your reference to Robert Henri's teaching abilities. About 12 years ago, I bought his book, being thrilled with every page, reread and still blown away. My son who is a lutist asked where I got it so I ordered one for him. I ended up ordering 10 copies that through the years, I gave to very special people. One of which was a teacher of art in a college in the East. He was doing a teaching tour between school sessions (This is Oklahoma) He was so excited, as I had given it to him on the final day of his class. He said his copy had graced his coffee table for many years and was tattered and torn but would stay there so he could add the new one to his private collection. You need not be an artist (as in painting) to appreciate his wisdom and experiences.

If you want to teach, get a teaching certificate.There is at least as much skill and understanding necessary to teach as there is needed to make art. Self-taught teachers may suffer just as many pitfalls in their craft as self-taught artists in theirs. Both teachers and artists require a good education which includes good training. Only then can we hope to limit the proffering of poisonous pedagogy in art education ... as well as buffoonery.

Okay.... so where would we be without teachers?

If we all agreed that we should spend our time working on our own creativity making the decision not to teach, we wouldn't have any teachers! I believe it is the responsibility of "those who can" to teach those who are interested to learn. ( I also believe there are a lot of artists who don't have the attributes necessary to teach) I remember students in art college covering their work with their hands so you couldn't see their secret ways. I don't know where these people are today. I had some amazing teachers. From high school right through to my first employer I have been taught by selfless individuals who took the time to show me how to draw and paint. Teaching is about sharing and communicating. By articulating your process, you are helping the entire art world to better understand art.

I am going to my High School art teacher's 80th birthday celebration this month. I haven't even begun to discuss the benefits of the friends we make through teaching!

My first employer always said " Andy, I expect you to share what I'm teaching you with others"

That is what teaching is for me.... sharing.

Oh, my. I am baffled by the barrage of defensiveness that this topic has brought out. Why should the decision of one person, recognizing both personal limitations and needs, be threatening to those who do choose to teach, out of either necessity or personal fulfillment? Though many simply spoke of the value of teaching to their own art, many of the posts went well past that into personal criticism. I am also baffled by the assumption of many that somehow the personal decision of some artists not to teach reflects on the value and necessity of teaching as a whole. The writer didn't say anything at all about that, and it occurs to me that if every artist of accomplishment taught, there would be a glut. But particularly baffling to me was the rather snide and denigrating comment about the mystery that art held for the writer. What was that all about? The writer seemed to me to simply be using the word to express something that I suspect most of us experience but use other words for: art isn't just technique.

As for the presumed gender of this individual, we should note that many male artists have been financially supported by spouses, family, patrons, or grants for centuries. Are the rules different for female artists? Ah, my, both sexism and classism at work. How sad.

Why couldn't more of us simply recognize that some people are good teachers and enjoy it, while others do not? Isn't that the real point here?

Dear Ms Dayle Ann- Unfortunately we do not live in a planetary culture where all are equal. Many may be striving for this goal- but it has not been reached.


More unfortunately- as so many women move towards the idea of equality- they cling desperately to the notion that they are somehow special because they have a uterus and can birth children- though not without the help of some handy-dandy sperm.


Women are not special. Men are not special either- unless we are all special- including us gay folk- just for being.


There is an incredible amount of male-bashing going on by women in our culture. Until all female repression AND all male bashing end- there's still a problem. Are you part of the problem?


I'm part of the solution because- being in the middle between the war between men and women- I can see both sides. And I just love pointing out both sides to both sides!


Robert Genn presents as a financially successful artist. He tries to share with us all how he became one. But his reality and mine are different and I've not succeeded at my art making as he has. So you are right- men can end up in that group of artists who have been helped/patronized. But women in our culture STILL grow up being taught by every thing and every one that they are special little princesses- so their assumption that they might EXPECT SUPPORT simply exists. And it will continue to exist until all women are taught to be utterly self-sufficient from the get-go.


Men are taught to EXPECT TO SUPPORT- it's a whole different ball game.

Ah Bruce, the world is even more screwed up than you think. What you described is white people's world. Take one step into an average black community and it is all different. There aren't many men that stick around and support. We all wear blinds and if things do change, they will just get screwed up in some other way.

Hi Barb- gotta tell you- if I'd said that- folks would be calling me a racist! I'm not. But I am an anti-heterosexist! And gender discrepancies- well those I'm interested in.

The problem you are describing isn't just a black community problem because there are other ethnic and social groups who are pretty much the same.

Begs the larger question... what are you (we) doing about it as a community? And of course it all comes down to personal responsibility.

I chose to pursue my art. I chose to NOT father any children. I saw how having children got in people's way and I took my own path.

Most people are unwilling to actually have the sex/procreation/birth control/children raising discussion with themselves and their children early on. Too bad- as I'm all for a lot of sex.

One never gets to truly know oneself until one knows oneself sexually- and you can get there without having sex.

But instantly having a family because you had sex gets in the way of pretty much everything else. Yet adults have such a difficult time talking about what is just a totally natural part of human existence/experience.

What a great video!

The art of teaching, like many constructs, is a continuum. One extreme focuses on the information some people think you ought to know. Teachers in this style deliver definitions, examples, more and more detailed explanations of theory and practice. At the other extremem the teacher first tries to find out where you are currently at, what you know right now and considers how he or she can help you grow in your own personal direction. .In practice, the good teacher does a bit of each of these things and, hopefully, aims at making the student able to act creatively on their own, rather than always trying to model themselves in the shape of their teacher.

I have returned to art rather late in life, with the notion that many of the best things I have learned, including the ability to teach myself, were not learned from others. Yet one of the main reasons I am currently moving to a new place is to find an even more supportive group of artist friends and more places to show my art.

Teaching is simply about pssing on the good stuff while trying to assist others to avoid the pitfalls. I have had the great good fortune to have many great teachers in my life and they have mostly been dogs and cats !!!! They have taught me the folly of fighting a battle where non exists. Chill out people....Robert has just wound us all up yet again!! Notice he stays well out of any discussion he starts??....heheheheee