Boy am I glad you happen to be a man saying those things, Robert! Thank you from the bottom of my heart.

Not only are the men not listening, but they think that when their women listen they are being hoodwinked! Why would their women need to go learn anything from others when they have this wonderful male creature at home who already knows everything and is "getting on with things" as you say.
My erstwhile man even thought there must be something fishy going on for me to want to learn from you, Robert! Learn from you online and in books!

I do think there is still a strong territorial issue that goes on with men, and I don't mean painting landscapes.

Thanks for giving me a chance to blurt this out. :)

Years ago when the Japanese were building a North American market for their cars they did their homework and realized that women had a far greater say in what vehicle was purchased than was believed and so they aimed their marketing at women far more than had been done in the past. And got great sales out of it.
It strikes me as ironic that as women enter the art field in larger numbers that your top four galleries are only showing 27% women artists and that in ten years it has only gone up by 3%. Somebody is not doing the math. Unless there's a huge prejudice against buying work by women artists, which I can't believe, then there must be a prejudice against selling it. That I don't understand either. But then, all three galleries I'm in are owned or run by women. Go figure.
Thanks for the info Robert,
Richard

Now that's what I call sweet revenge, Robert. Through the ages there have of course been women artists. About.com writes "As Renaissance humanism opened up individual opportunities for education, growth, and achievement, a few women transcended gender role expectations". Aha.
Those magic words "gender expectations". In some parts of the globe women are sadly still treated as the inferior species, though we should know better. Historically speaking it was almost impossible for a woman to break out and do her own thing until comparatively recently (and not everywhere!). Not that women weren't painting in the old days. But they were usually prevented from "coming out" over it e.g. Artemisia Gentileschi.
So now we have a reversal of the situation. Workshops and painting courses attract many more women than men, and the old excuse that women have more free time just does not hold, given that many women have full-time jobs and still have to care and cater for home and family.
The fact is that women are better at finding time to do what they have to/want to/need to. The secret is multi-tasking. A big challenge for the male gender, a way of life for us females.
Sweet revenge, when men stay home to guard the furniture and fittings and women sally forth on adventures!

Maybe I should add that in some parts of the world women still uphold this "god" image of man; they allow (yes even encourage) their daughters to be genitally mutilated; they breed sons to be suicide-bombers; they are prevented from getting higher education (in some cases any education at all)..... For Westerners it's hard to understand how powerful such traditions can be, since the age of executing non-believers has thankfully ended (but not so long ago). Here in Germany immigrant women in various traditional outfits ask (me) to tell them how much an item on a supermarket shelf costs because in our age of so-called modern enlightenment in a modern society they are totally illiterate - and don't seem able to change anything, or are being prevented from doing so, since a modern society is less influential than a long-held traditional belief (that women are there to breed not rule).
This discussion is bound to transcend the question of who goes to a cultural event such as Robert's talk. But it probably won't change anything. Indoctrination - religious or cultural - is a powerful tool used mainly to subjugate.

Robert, on this matter I am as fascinated by the remarks of your respondents as by your own presenting comments. This time you did not provide prescriptions but expressed your own quandry. The stats are not alarming to me but that is not to say I understand whether we are watching a setting trend or a role reversal or anything that should cause any of us to be concerned. It appears a natural progression of the liberty women have been taking and enjoying in recent decades to break conventional and cultural expectations. Perhaps a higher percentage of men will give themselves freedom one of these decades to enjoy a walk through rose gardens of Vienna, and to value the spontaneity of watercolours running on a page, and sit long enough to hear ocean waves gently touching rocks along the shoreline. It all takes time.

Liberty from what, Ron?

the increase in dominance by women is not limited to the art field. In my own area of business, daily newspapers, women gradually became dominate in the news departments, the classified sales department, the business office and since computerization of the mechanical area, they dominate there as well. Not only were the ladies as accomplished as the men, corporations could hire them at less salary. Perhaps the gender roles are changing for better or worse. And I notice that men who are engaged in art and similar creative activities are often cosidered sissified and odd by their male counterparts. All hooey of course but that's the reality. What goes around comes around. I enjoy being associated with the women in my art activities. They communicate well and at a higher level than most of the men.

Thank you Robert - it's so good to read a man writing about the marked bias of women towards learning and development. I've just tweeted this article as highly recommended - but I'm guessing not many male artists will come and read it. Just as they didn't turn out for your talk. More's the pity.

My own experience of workshops and courses is that women often account for about 90-100% of those enrolling with only a few managing to achieve the ratio of two thirds women. I guess one of the lessons for those who aspire to teach art is that you better get on well with women and talk their language!

I have wondered for some time why it is that art seems to be about 30 years behind the times in terms of the achievements of women within the context of how other occupations and the rest of the economy have progressed. On my blog, I've started to monitor the gender of those entering major art competitions in the UK and those winning prizes. The results make for interesting reading. I've started to comment on the disparities too see BP Portrait Award - who enters and who gets selected. I wonder if other readers agree that women should do more to highlight the ways in which bias appears to prevail in terms of who gets selected for galleries, running art societies, winning art competitions etc. I'd love to see more men like Robert choose to do so as well.

Hah! The hyperlink didn't work.

If you click my name you'll get the link to my blog. Insert "BP Portrait Award - who enters and who gets selected." in the Google search on the blog and it will identify the blog post in which you can read about gender issues relating to portraiture and the UK's top portrait prize.

This is probably one for the psychologists but, maybe the ratio is skewed so much in favor of women because women feel a stronger need to attain social acceptance & standing via their art while men are more content to create their art quietly without stardom recognition.

Be careful of how you read statistics. It may also say something more about the education system and how thing are taught and learned.

We rise again :)
Thousands of years ago, before "women's knowledge scared the heck out of men", women were worshipped as Goddesses; Freya, Diana, Brigid, Artemis and Venus to name a few.

I'm glad we're not still stuck in the times when women had to hide in the guise of men in order to take non-traditional gender-expected paths, or use male nom de plume when publishing their writing.

Maybe the men joined the club to make art ?

Maybe the reason men don't join art groups is that for women, art as decoration (not social commentary) is a socially acceptable "pastime", while only men who are very sure of themselves join the group. The men have to overcome the idea that art is somehow not a manly concern, ridiculous as that sounds. Maybe that's why women who are interested in art join groups, while men who may be interested stay away, unless their drive to learn is large enough to overwhelm the fear of implied social criticism.
The irony here is that most artists don't consider their work to be mere decoration, and men who are brave and individualistic enough to be artists are very often looked up to; they stand above the crowd. Perhaps that also explains why 75% of the artists in galleries are men, or maybe it is that men are socially conditioned to try to make money with what they do more than women are.

Oh, wow. This one will be pages long in responses! Several observations:
It comes down to women perfectly willing to stop and ask directions while most men will drive in circles for 30 min before they will ask anyone. Art is no different.
I know women who sign their work with initials rather than their feminine name so their work will not be dismissed. Sadly, it works.
I dislike blaming everything on discrimination, but I will term it perception: all the great artists were men, right? It is cultural and social acceptance at a very deep level and exists even in western perspectives today.
It is still bewildering why men are perceived as more dedicated in their pursuit of art while women are considered hobbyists.
And, my dear female colleagues, quit buying into justifying your lack of success and men's triumphs. We are our own worst detractors.
As long as women have babies and are the main caregivers that will not change. Women have always laid down their ambitions to raise their families. Men never undergo the angst of having to choose between career and nurturing their children. It doesn't exist.
Along with that, I would like to see the age demographic of these women at that art club. I would bet there were mostly older women who are now able to seek a career in art after their families were raised.
Men normally seek their education for a life career when they are young. "Okay, I've got all I need to make a living." We know art is a life long pursuit one never is finished with our education.
And finally Robert, the particular book signing you made this observation, few men will leave the comfort of their own home to show homage, and listen to their wives gush and profess their admiration to another man. Especially if it was on a game night. Alpha male syndrome. :-)

Interesting and provocative, Robert (as usual).

Unfortunately, in spite of aspiring to superior education and forming the majority in a number of "helping" professions (doctoring and teaching, e.g.) I don't think that women are going to take over the world. Stats still suggest that for all of their achievements, women earn about 2/3 of men's wages, for similar work, and that at the senior levels, men still dominate.
I suspect that women join art associations as much for social reasons as to advance their careers - in fact I suspect that for most women, art is an activity, rather than a career, which may explain why gallery representation is skewed so heavily toward male representation.

Some of the female artists I know have stopped using their first names when signing their work preferring to be neutral. After reading your post this morning I am going to encourage them to use their full names.

To Sally Ann Baker: given Robert's comments, why would you suggest to your female friends that they use their full name? There is an apparent bias in favour of male artists being taken seriously, and if Robert's comments regarding gallery representation are not enough, a walk through any museum should make it clear that women are at a distinct disadvantage as artists: using only one's initials allows one's work to stand on its own, with no gender baggage to affect the viewer. It is unfortunate, but it is a fact.

I recently commented to Carol Marine about what I jokingly (not condescendingly) referred to as the 'token' guy, in her workshop photo. Without exception, painting workshops are filled with women and one or two guys. I have no answers as to whether men are resistant to learning from women, but in one workshop I attended, a man complained to me about the teacher demo-ing in a way that suggested that the teacher ( a man) was stealing the student's painting time. I feel differently about that and am rapt when the instructor is 'showing us'.
Sometimes I attend an artists demo when it is offered to the public for a small fee, whether or not I am registered for the class, because watching the artist paint is so informative.
My opinion though, is that men are less open than women in many ways, to either change or learning. Don't know if that's culture or biology. In defense of men, they just haven't been allowed to be as 'soft' as women (if that's the word) and I'm sure it hinders them some.
I enjoy reading your newsletter even when you are on a yacht in the Mediterranean and I am shoveling snow ;)

well it finally happened you put the final straw on the poor camels back. It's time for me to say goodbye Robert and Ladies. I have read all you ladies whining about everything from muses, getting in touch with feelings to the bad vibrations left in there studios after the male painters left and all the rest of the artistic drivel.
Men don't like to go to workshops and blog sites because of all the getting in touch with your feelings crap spouted. we only go for art instruction, which there is very little of. So again goodbye everyone! Stop complaining start painting...

goodbye Tim, you won't be missed

"To every thing there is a season, and a time to every purpose under...heaven." In this blink of an eye, in the vast continuum of time, it is now a time for women. The doors of opportunity have been opened and we are dancing through them with joy (and some anxiety in trying to be too much to too many). Those door are open to guys if they choose, if not more so. It is a cycle: it has been so in the past and will most certainly change in the future as humanity changes. As for the discrepency in % of women artists vs. those in galleries--hard work ladies! As for me, I'm enjoying the moment and you guys should celebrate with us!

Jack, I'm so glad you told Tim goodbye for us. I think most of us here are VERY serious about our art (man or woman).

Robert, I don't know where you got your data re. "women in engineering". My experience (in the U.S.A.) is that the percentage of women engineers is increasing rapidly. The lady engineers I've worked with (oil & gas and chemical industries) are better prepared than their male counterparts! They seem to take their professional status more seriously.

Does it really come down to being a man or a woman...should it not be about doing a good job?

As a man in an art class I'm out numbered by the ladies by at least 3 to 1 and frankly, I don't mind that at all. Everyone in my class is producing interesting pieces and it is great to see the variety and treatment of subject material. It doesn't matter that there are more women than men, it's more about the quality of the pieces than the gender of the artists.
I can't speak for all men but I don't think I have any issues with listening to or learning from the ladies. And, if we as a society we are moving from have having male dominated professions to having a more even spilt then that seems like a good thing. Wouldn't it be ideal if in the future the most talented people were at the top of every profession and the rest of us didn't care about their gender or background.

If there is any kind of social event women are at the front of the line. Book signing in is the same. Don't feel bad, Robert. I think it is in their genes. In classes, workshops or art shows the ladies are about 70% of the attendees. The percentage of awards going to women in local competitions are just as high. The thing I have noticed is that women seem relish at being the social organizers in art shows and competitions. Also if there is an ear around they will do anything to make sure it is being used. They do love to talk. Don't get upset ladies but I can't talk and paint at the same time.

I see a strange phenomenon among the children of my working cohorts. Their daughters are driven in school (right through college) and the sons seem to become overgrown tweeners at 27 years of age. Young women with information worker and white collar jobs are supporting their under-employed spouses. The young women are buying sensible cars, paying off student loans, and save, but the young men are playing video games, driving jeeps and buying jet skis. While this isn't universally so, among my acquaintances, it is an increasing trend. It's even worse in some minority communities. At local art openings, the representation is currently running about 50/50, but with single artist shows the men still have a strong edge. That last male bastion will fall shortly. There is a significant movement afoot. It might not be a problem, however. Empowerment of women has been long coming. But let's hope that someday we don't wind up swinging in an opposite direction and needing to have consciousness raising about the stereotyping of and lack of opportunity for men.

I inquired at a local gallery recently and the first thing they asked was how many paintings I was capable of turning out. This confirmed what I had suspected for a while. Women artist are perceived as slow producers because many of us have family commitments. They may have a valid concern. What they should be doing though is looking at artists on an individual basis and their track record....

If women are busy building empires, where will the new customers be coming from?" Not to worry, Robert.
The customers will still be there, because the glass ceiling will never be broken. During WW2 women built planes, trains, ammunition, cars, ran factories, schools, offices - and then went back to the previous status quo when the men came back. There were female painters in Europe hundreds of years ago who were just as good as the male Masters (Judith Leyster, Artemisia Gentileschi, Maria van Oosterwijk, to name a few), and more modern ones such as Tamara de Lempicka and Georgia O'Keefe. However, as you point out yourself, " In my four top galleries it looks like 27% of living artists represented are women. Ten years ago it was 24% ". Even in our more liberal and educated society, status quo still reigns.
Am I a feminist? No, just a realist.

Interesting that at least in the United States women still earn 76% of what men do on average. So higher interest, involvement and education don't seem to help women receive incomes that are even at par with those of men. And really what would be the problem if women were all the doctors, lawyers and artists? Men would still be the bankers and CEO's. Don't mean to be sour grapes but look what that's done for us so far.

I have returned to full time art school after raising children and earning a living as a graphic designer. I was surprised to see that the class was 95% women, and most of them were older than myself.
I think the reason for the imbalance is financial. The men are still having to work! My husband is an industrial photographer, and he would love to do fine-art photography... but then we would have no income... Painting sales do not an income make!

Shirley Peters, that's an attitude you picked up from some of your teachers.

I just mounted my first show at the age of 40 and got the curator from the local gallery to come down and review my show - no holds barred. And, of course, I simply don't produce enough to be able to select the top 10% for a show. I don't produce enough to make the mistakes I am longing to make. I often have entire lists that could take days that have little to do with art. I agonize over the balance, with as much compassion for myself as I can muster. My husband started a new job in September and I have started teaching after-school art, Art for Mothers at the YMCA and will be teaching felting at the local Art Gallery in March. All this teaching and mounting of a show means that I am limited in how much I am actually making. And also since September, it has dawned on me that my son is fairly dyslexic on top of his ADD and that he absolutely needs more of my time. My other son has very bad excema which needs constant management and doctors. Everyone needs cuddles and soups and bandages. Mostly, it's tiresome having so many legitimate pulls on me.

And don't even get me started about the insidiousness of the nuclear family. Humans didn't evolve in these tiny units and they require unnatural things from both men and women. (Not to mention the selfish indiviualism from which the nuclear family stems is really bad for the environment.) I have very strong female role models in my mother and mother-in-law. Both of them raised children and then went to work after their kids were in school and both had very successful careers, (one even as an artist). Nevertheless, our culture now is faster than theirs was 30 years ago and there are still only 24 hours in a day. It doesn't surprise me that we women need the community and support of your newsletter and are still such a small percentage of featured artists in galleries.

I do not wish away any of the men/boys in my life but I am increasingly fine with allowing what little art I happen to make to be funded by my husband's career. I do this with slightly too much bitter self-righteousness (perhaps the only way to justify it and not feel mother's guilt), when I think of Klimt or Gaugin or countless other male artists who took mistresses and lovers, and catered to every artistic whim, while their wives, sisters and mothers toiled.

I have noticed this trend for the last ten years. Here in Melbourne Florida, women have become the "movers and shakers" in the world of art.
The artists demographic here is 50 - 65 years of age. Is this new age quilting clubs? Being very connected with the arts community here...the women who have been teaching (and offering workshops at the local Museum) are unable to fill their classes. The economy perhaps, but I doubt it.
Recently I had a call from a woman who bought and rehabbed an historic home, she divided it into studio spaces for rent, and converted the garage into a teaching studio. All the studios are occupied by women...anyway, she was looking for an oil instructor - my class filled immediately. I've never taught before. I also run a weekly plein air painting group...men rule!

What can I say, we birth, we paint, we rock!

If any forum members happen to visit Washington DC bless yourselves with a visit to the National Museum for Women in the Arts. Theirs is one of the finest collections in the country. Besides painters, they support writers, musicians, poets, and sculptors. I consider my membership the most positive thing I can do to promote women in the arts.

http://www.nmwa.org/

If the numbers of women studying and learning is growing...100% at you lecture, 67% on your website, why are the galleries showing 73% male artists?

I paint on silk www.silkartist.co.uk and give talks and demonstrations to many types of group. Many of them are women's groups but when I visit art groups many of the men don't attend. I think this is because they think silk painting is a female activity. Those men who do brave it enjoy my talk and tell me that the men who stayed away "Don't know what they missed!"

It is a fact that there are very many more female silk painters than male. I have found that when a male works in an area that is female dominated they must really excel if they want to make their mark. Flower arranging is another example but from what you write it seems more widespread.

! I have taught art to adults for over 15 years, and there is usually one or two brave males in my classes, the rest are women. I founded and used to run Leading Edge Art Workshops, and my clients were mostly female. The men seemed to come out much more for the male instructors than for the female instructors. I think most men have an aversion to being under the ‘authority’ of a woman. It is interesting that most of the more prestigious galleries have a majority of men artists, and no, I don’t think it is because they ‘know it all’, or are particularly better than the women artists. I believe there is an existing stereotype that says that if a man has dedicated his life to art, it is a career, and therefore worthy of being taken seriously. For women, the same level of commitment is considered a hobby. As a woman, I really grit my teeth at the reality of the injustice of it all. I would love to hear what the statistics are on which sex purchases the most art!

I have been teaching drawing and painting at The Forum Art Centre since 1990. I have noticed through the years the female students taking classes is closer to 95%. Does that say something about the males in Winnipeg? I enjoy teaching the women, they seem to enjoy learning new methods and are willing to try different things.

I have been selling my art for for over 20 years. I know that art is a luxury item and is really the last thing people buy. I also know that 95% of the population, won't like my work. Of the 5% left over, only 1% can afford it. And if a couple comes to buy in my studio, no matter what, it is ultimately the wife's decision which piece to buy. If a husband comes to my studio, I know he will return with his wife later. Rarely to they choose the same piece. They go home with the piece the wife has chosen.
Anytime I have done artist talks or interviews, it is the women who attend and take notice. This is not to say that men don't love or appreciate art. Men seem to respond faster, they know what they like and what they don't like. Women do too, they just need to make sure they have gone around the block and viewed it from all sides.

Of the three art associations I belong to the percentage of men members are: 19%, 20%, 30%. Yes, where are all the men?. Playing golf?

About 95% of my workshop students are women. I see women as being more fluid and open to new ideas than my gender. We men are more like concrete. Hanging out with women is good for loosening us up. I see women as excellent in business as well as networking is very natural for them. In the new web paradigm , networking is the name of the game. In my own field of pastel, I've noted many more women climbing the ladder in their careers. THey have no problem 'playing the game'...entering the right shows and obtaining memberships in the right societies etc. Men aren't generally good joiners and some us chafe at playing the game. We tend to be 'sovereign nations' rather than members in communities. THe only less positive thing I see among these very effective women artists is that they sometimes seem to have difficulty finding their own voice and distinct style. Perhaps they are too malleable and assimilating. Of course, it is dangerous to generalize in this gender mine field. I'm a big fan of women myself. I heard once that you could judge the health of a society by the health and treatment of women in that society. Vital, strong , creative women are a blessing to all of us. We men would do well to learn from their success.

To John R. Struck regarding female vet graduates who 'do not remain vets'... have you considered that perhaps, being female, they are having difficulty finding work and that is why they drop out?

One more thing to consider on this topic: at a certain age, women outnumber men by 2 to 1. Considering this, that changes the ratio aspect of men to women somewhat.

But in your last sentence you left out the word "think". It should have read, "By the way ---------------do men THINK they know it all etc.etc.

I have been teaching classes in oils for years and have always noticed the dearth of male participation. I told a class of women that its exactly what they knew about most men...they think they know it all already or they are to scared to show they don't...

Hey, Robert, i just LOVE statistics, and 90% of the time i make up my own.... but being a female reading a male, i took yours as God's honest truth... THAT should be good for another statistical rumination.

I have been subscribed to your letter since my former school art teacher and current (male) friend and role model reccomended the Painter's Keys website to me. I value your thoughts and opinions.
However, I found this letter highly disappointing. I make it no secret that I am a feminist - something I must say is a radical notion considering most girls my age are forgetting what their mothers fought for and are returning to a world without much female thought (or any thought, really). I am constantly fighting for respect in my classes from chauvenistic teachers and pig-headed peers. This is no different in the art room. It seems that there is an unspoken understanding that the guys create expressive art, while the girls are meant to create pretty pictures. For a straight female such as myself to want to live life as a REAL artist, this notion is highly insulting and pathetic. I fight for my respect not only among men (actually boys - the men are decent human beings!) but also women and girls because I, as a feminist and as a human being, want to be seen in every way - socially, professionally, and artistically - as equal - no better and no worse - than an equally qualified male. Today, all the news media is buzzing about womens' mass return to work and everything, but in my mind, women are taking one big step backward in their mindsets.
The truth is that there should not be any distinction in gender in art.
It shouldn't matter who created a work as long as it makes you think.
That doesn't mean that that is what people believe - just what they should.

As you read this letter, I continue to work - just as any man - to improve myself as an artist, a student, and a person.

There is more than one proposition to explain this.

1. Yes women do network more easily as a generality.
2. You have been successful in hooking women's interest because of your seductive way of writing.
3. Men are out at work earning the money that allows wife's and partners to afford their interest and buy your book.
4. Women can project their status and security needs/aspirations onto men thus allowing more time to meet other human creative and nurturing needs. Men are still in the 21stC unable to do this in reverse.
5. Play is a preserve of the feminine where societal and cultural pressures inhibit and perhaps condemn the creative impulses of men.
6. Men do not want to learn from another person they are psychologically predisposed to find out for themselves. Rightly or wrongly.
As an aspiring artist at the age of 54 who has just had the contract of employment terminated and needs to find the wherewithal to pay pressing bills I am firstly more focused on job networking. Isolated in dealing with esteem issues and hurt as a lot of men and perhaps some women in this current financial climate are.
Despite having the time to do creative work, the internal and external pressures cruelly inhibit the ability to overcome difficulties and setbacks necessary to achieve success.

Does your book tackle this issue and when money is pressing would you still advise that I treat myself to buy your book?

Privilege has an unacknowledged deficit in its inability to stand in the shoes of others less fortunate to understand the cruelty of the huge waste of talents in this world which is still about the baseline struggle to be heard and understood.

It's absolutely predictable. The relationship between learning, real learning, self-practiced and self-motivated, and success has long been known. Oddly enough, the fact that womens' opinions do get regularly blown off by men could be part of the inspiration for this. Women more often subscribe to the old adage "the more you know, the more you know you don't know."

Women tend to seek out what they don't get taught in schools and recently schools have been teaching to the lowest common denominator and teaching to the test, rather than inspiring the love of learning and encouraging creative and independent thinking.

There are those women, however, who seek out men to do the teaching and fall into the sheeple category, trying to emulate successful artists not by emulating their knowledge level or insight capabilities, but simply by parroting their work, but I believe they are in the minority, and are rarely successful in art or in other areas in their lives.

Most importantly, women value creativity. Creative solutions are almost mandatory for folks dealing with children at home, or trying to get by on a small budget (historically, women control most of the spending in households, for food and upkeep, etc.), or balancing work and home life.
Those who value and practice creativity are more likely to be successful and focus on the individual contributions that they can make (not being sheeple).

Years ago there was a study on teaching art, which found that art skills help people deal creatively with life (I wish I had a reference to it, but I don't -- I think it was done in Colorado ) and that dumping art programs from schools was a really bad idea. As things like No Child Left Behind forced schools to focus more on testing than creativity, it's logical that the women who wanted to keep those creative elements in their lives, who independently signed up for art courses and other imaginative programs, would begin to pull ahead of men in the success department.

Well I'v read all the letters so far. Boy it's true. Women sure do talk a lot. So far can't see that they have SAID anything. But then I'm past 80 and my generation did not have the time to whine so much. We were too busy DOING it. Making changes I mean. And thanks to Ted. Someone had to be less than "politically correct" and say it.

I think it is all about integrating the female power - be it a man or a woman. All of the work can be done differently. Just decide from your heart. Look - don´t judge.

When I got my first dog I was told by a breeder that the alpha dog in every litter is always a female (I think she used the word "bitch" as breeders are want to)...interesting fact, since if you want to be the alpha dog, you would tend to want to be the best educated...my male friends think it's great that women want to do all the work. They say "Let them. We'll stay at home and watch the game."

Perhaps the gender issue may be a result of men dealing with the disappointment of our failed systems more than women. The journey over the last 50 years has been one of historical awareness, and an effort to correct coupled with a blast of bravado in which people die creating more issues that need correcting. My apologies for the simplicity of this explanation for as we all know it truly is very complex, and as a thoughtful artist it is quite a bit to grasp and process. My work has come to an absolute standstill for I don't feel at this time representing the athletic world is a valid effort given the state of it. I started out in an effort to honor those processes in athleticism that brings the individual to the spirit of growth. Competition should lead to cooperation that in turn leads to contribution. That is not happening now, rather a decadence that is serving no one, not even the individual participating in the self deception. Perhaps women do not see it as something that would give call for halt and review.
Despite any of societies ills the number one industry in the world is still fashion for women which I feel gives them great power to stop much of what was going on. What would happen if all of the world's women did not buy clothes for one year in protest of an issue? In the world's number one industry that would have quite some impact. Maybe what you are seeing is just that trend whereby women are seeing in Art that reflection time, and my original assessment is a hasty one. It makes me feel an intense desire to speak to them, and all about the human condition within my work. I am looking for a voice.

No, Robert, women will not slay dragons. We will tame them, just like we've done with unicorns for years. Oh, and that bit about being a virgin in order to attract a unicorn is just plain nonsense. Grandmothers have been keeping unicorns alive for years.

Robert, you're a glutton for punishment. First you start a war between "early risers" and "late sleepers". That caused a ruckus.

Now you're starting a comparison of accomplishments between genders.

Why not just tie a pork chop around your neck and slap Siegfried's tiger?

Maybe the men are all out slaying dragons, and when they at last get home, they need to stay there and rest. Women generally have more flexible lives (a euphemism for having a wider range of responsibilities that pull them in many directions), and having been home while my kids were home, and working when they were in school, I can say that getting out for something that focuses exclusively on my interests was a rare treat.

When it all comes down to it, consider the percentage of men who make their living by creating art. Taking your quote, "In my four top galleries it looks like 27% of living artists represented are women", that means a whopping 73% of career artists are men.

As a general trend, I'd say women are still slogging their way towards being able to develop their own gifts into rewarding careers. I look forward to the day when half the artists are women.

I go to gallery openings and most of the men there are accompanying there significant others [aka: sigothers]. Much of the traffic I see in art stores is female,[ I notice these things] much of museum and gallery staffs are female, and it seems that the much of the exciting new work I see in the galleries and museums is by women.
I think one part of this is that women are more interested in participating in social organization, more interested in verbal communication and more interested in each other. Men are more interested in exploiting what is there for their own benefit, and of course being more individual. Much of the new work is about social interaction and language and that is female territory.
This goes back to "asking for directions" difference in the sexes, I don't ask directions because I am pretty sure most people have no better idea where they are or are going than I am.
I have to think about this some more and will post those comments on my blog : http://profile.typepad.com/jfitzsim by the way, I have been posting useful tips about studio organization, brush care, etc etc.

“Living” is the key word in your last statistic about women’s representation in galleries, so it’s no wonder. Most of my friends in Montreal speak casually about what they would do after their spouses passed on - as if it’s a given. I was born in India and grew up feeling isolated as a woman so your stats were uplifting even though they refer to the West only. I believe that women have always brought special gifts to the table, no matter in what century or what country. It’s men’s thinking that has evolved. I continue to crusade for women and women’s rights through my art, because even though statistics point in a certain direction, hard reality tends to be a tad different.

Hi Robert, it's the same at our FCA meetings. Even the executive has a greater number of women on it than men.
there could be many reasons for this and I sure you would be aware of them, but I wonder, after women have been suppressed so much in the past that this is a sort of catch-up that we are seeing. It seems to be happening in all professional fields. Even their voting rights have been recognized. In addition, in the Edwardian era, women were expected to stay home and raise children as well as manage the household. They were not allowed to get a university education. A woman artist be it music or visual arts were never taken seriously.

Robert, I think the observations are correct. I belong to several coop's and one salon group, they are mostly women. I think the reason may be simple, women tend to be "joiners", for whatever anthropological reason. I don't think most women want to be men particularly, the trends don't really show that. I wouldn't worry!!

I have found that men artists on the whole are far less interested in sharing their art, process, emotions than women. I know a lot of artists and the women are the sharers. They are the community builders. They are the relationship people--open, welcoming, supportive, sharing. Men, on the other hand, are very protective, defensive and uncomfortable sharing anything at all. I sense a very very competitive attitude with men, perhaps even born of insecurity. So I congratulate all the women artists who make a huge effort to communicate, share, and understand. It is a most welcome and beautiful thing.

Isn't it a surprise that with so many women artists and learners that we are only 27% of the living artists in the gallery?
Doesn't it strike you as odd?
But then, of course, making art, reading about art, and creating art does not mean "selling art". It would be interesting to know how many of the women artists buying your book, reading this blog, or attending workshops care whether or not they SELL art or are fulfilling the life long dream of just "enjoying" art by making it and showing it and giving it away? Art can be, as is well documented in your blog, a way to meditate, re-focus on the importance in the world, and a way to express what we feel about life in general. Don't get into the bad habit of only talking to those who want to make art as a living. Women generally live longer than men and I would argue that they find more avenues for creative focus than men.

Leesburg, Florida

The "percentage of males willing to listen to females" tracks almost exactly the percentage of males married to females. And I resemble that remark.

Interesting, Robert, but you miss an important point: if 75% of the artists are women, why are 73% of the living artists represented by galleries men? I think this is called sexism. Interesting too that despite that, women are still on the cutting edge of learning.

Esoterica really has some issues. All the new customers are going to come from the over 65 Seniors who are continuing to live beyond yesterday's life spans. They will be the ones who will buy all this new stuff, though they will be tougher bargainers than younger folks. Plus we have over 6 billion people in the world. With countries developing overnight, I don't think there will be a customer shortage.

Just had to tell you I smiled and chuckled many times as I read your piece just now. Sociologists are indeed worrying about the men and writing books about it, but based on the men I know, very few of the straight (not gay) ones do much introspection even if they are creative.
Unfortunately the catch is that men are raised by their mothers and their peers and then there is the hard-wiring as well, which Mary Tannen has written about in many of her books.

Until the mothers, and fathers when they are involved, start pushing back against the hard wiring of men to be competitive and combative, and the military starts taking sexual abuse seriously and gets their mind around homosexuality, the current patterns are unlikely to change. And Hollywood will just keep reinforcing the old values since that is what sells movies to the demographic that drives movie revenue--young, violence-loving men.

I believe it will take a man with both feet in the mainstream and able to change values (unlike Robert Bly who I guess is still pretty fringe) to write a book, make a movie, and start a movement to demonstrate the gains to all from men learning to behave both competitively and cooperatively, combatively and nurturingly, as women are already learning, before anything changes very much.

In the meantime, me and every other woman I know will just keep going our separate ways, learning and growing, and keep loving our men for what they are, which is sadly pretty limited on the emotional plane.

Surprisingly enough most or all prominent art prizes are won by men. The list of the most important artists of the 20. century includes 4 women. Something to think about

ARGH. In my "day job", I work as a female engineer in the auto industry, in a company where I heard that the ratio of men to women is over 600 to 1. My favorite story is the day that I flew people from companies around North America to a factory somewhere in the US (far from my Canadian home, in any case) in order to attend a meeting I was chairing. One man came in the room and asked me to get him coffee...apparently mistaking me for the token secretary in the room. I might have ignored his mistake except for all of the blushing and stammering from him when I started the meeting.

We women have a long way to go, but thank goodness we are out there representing ourselves and our professions. Perhaps our daughters will have an easier path towards equality.

Thanks for helping to spread the awareness, Robert.

There is too much gratitude here to pack into one short reply. Suffice it to say that for this artist living in a remote westcoast community your twice-weekly letters are far more welcome than just about anything else coming down the pipeline. Like many artists with little other contact with the bigger art world they sustain me - thank you.

Ever since my first exposure to algebra I realized I am not one for complex math like the demographics you bring up. Always one for more "hands-on" experience (and damn the torpedoes!) when my wife announced the approach of our 1st "blessed event" (after 11 years of blissfully unencumbered marriage) I knew it was time for compromise. She was getting an education that eventually led to a successful lifelong career - I was a struggling artist barely able to hold my own in spite of the penance of "day jobs". Almost gratefully I became "Mr. Mom" - in a few months I found myself living in a resource based community where the ability to fold diapers was not as admired as I felt it should be, given the complexity of that task (especially when being done single handedly, bouncing the unhappy child in need of said diaper on one's hip... try THAT for creativity, Mr. Picasso SIR!)

We raised three brilliant children (I am biased) who will go on to WOW the world - my greatest masterpieces! (...okay - the Missus played a part ... but women do that easily!)

I painted here and there whenever I could - grateful for the economic and domestic security that allowed me that privilege. I have a few hundred pictures and a wealth of experience - AND I got to be there for every important event in my childrens lives. If the world sees the current trend as a bad thing I'd like to raise my voice in humble protest and offer to educate a few people. Being a stay -at-home Dad is good for the kids. Maybe even good for the Missus. AND it really didn't hold back my art - take a look at the pictures.

Dad's make good "moms" - being there every day for your kids is simply good for everyone... (and oh... the Missus and I have been married for going on 34 years... so that hasn't suffered so much either.) Cheers!

I'm not a feminist and do not have an agenda, but find myself fascinated by all of this. I am now beginning to suspect that our concept of what constitutes "good" art is derived from an art history of predominantly male art and therefore keeps perpetuating itself.

I've received Bob's new book, and it's a masterpiece worthy of the content. Cover design, choice of typeface, the luscious, thin paper and bookmark - this is a class act from top to bottom, and well exemplifies today's Letter. The details are all in place, and immersing in them is irresistible. Thank you for this wonderful book, and for the honor of writing one of the forewords.

On topic:
Men are from Mars, women are from Venus, and generalizers are from Uranus. :)

I started three or four times to send in comments, but each became so long, no one would have had the time to read them. But I found myself over the week-end checking in to see if some of the readers who often comment, give us some inkling of their thoughts on this topic. J. Bruce Wilcox, where are your opinions and thoughts? I missed them. You always have another angle to consider.

Robert your stats are a bit misleading. Firstly, the 65% of women buying your book may be the women only writing the check while the man will read the book when it arrives. Also, when you think of the subject matter of the book, few men will sit through the diatribe of art blather enclosed. Men would rather do than talk about it as women are more want to do.
The 80/20 split in attendance could be explains that the men are working while the women have more time to listen to those who write and sell books.
For the 56 women signing up vs the 82 new signups, the same could be true. Men don't have as much time to sit and converse on computers about art, much of which conversation is heresay or opinion. It's a known fact that Sociologists have determined women to be more verbal than men. This is not to assume men are disinterested of ill informed. They just keep it to themselves more than women and when they do speak generally do it with fewer words than it took to fill your book.
Lastly, I don't think the women subscribers to your site should be lumped into "those willing to listen to men". That is very sexist in my humble opinion. I believe women like to listen to other women with like opinions and that could explain the imbalance.
As for more women getting an education than men, this is a sociological anomaly in today's society and has yet to be examined. The spike could be attributed to new freedoms women are experiencing and they are making up for the "lost" years when they were denied an education.
I, for one, never go to book signings nor do I converse on getting one. If I want it, I buy it without fanfare.
Statistics are a very tricky thing and can be slanted one way or another with any argument.

The short hairs on my neck go straight up when I read "men have little to no emotional content" as Suzanne Snell Tesh believes. I actually believe, being a man, that we have as much emotional "plane" as women but don't have a need to cry about it between ourselves all the time. Yes, we were raised to be strong and steadfast and keep our emotions in check. This is not to assume we are without emotions. Women should take a lesson and keep their emotions more in check and stop waving their hankies for the support of other emotional women. Many women I know are atypical in this regard and act more self reliant and still are women in every respect without the histrionics.
Men bashing seems to be rampant in today's society and we are sending the wrong message at the expense of men to our children. When this attitude prevails, the chasm between the sex’s increases and both sides are forced to play this "game" which perpetuates the split and differences between men and women.
As for men being responsible for the current situation the world finds itself, doesn't say much for the mothers who raised them and controlled their youth and upbringing. The problem, as I see it, could be traced back to when women started to get more say and put their oars in the water to stir the pot counter-clockwise.

I have been subscribed to your newsletter since my fomer school art teacher and current (male) friend and role model recommeneded the Painter's Keys website to me. I value your thoughts and opinions. However, I found this letter highly disappointing. I make it no secret that I am a feminist - something I must say is a radical notion considering most girls my age are forgetting what their mothers fought for and are returning to a world without much female thought (or any thought, really). I am constantly fighting for respect in my classes from chauvanistic teachers and pig-headed peers. This is no different in the art room. It seems that there is an unspoken understaning that the guys create expressive art, while the girls are meant to create pretty pictures. For a straight female such as myself to want to live life as a REAL artist, this notion is highly insulting and pathetic. I fight for my respect not only among men (actually boys - the men are decent human beings!) but also women and girls because I, as a feminist and as a human being, want to be seen in everyway - socially, professionally, and artistically - as equal - no better and no worse - than an equally qualified male. Today, all the news media is buzzing about womens' mass return to work and everything, but in my mind, women are taking one big step backward in their mindsets.
The truth is that there should not be any distinction in gender in art. It shouldn't matter who created a work as long as it makes you think. That doesn't mean that that is what people believe - just what they should.

As you read this letter, I continue to work - just as any man - to improve myself as an artist, a student, and a person.

Melissa

P.S. My motto: I am a Christian and an Artist; a Feminist and a Republican. (You can be both.)

There is an easy explanation why there are so many women artists but so few are in galleries. Women are very good in using all available means to get into arts, however, they are generally more difficult to work with, overbearing with their own needs and tend to backstab. Males are easier going as bosses, coworkers or business partners. I wish it wasn't so!

P.S. I admit I speak from bitter experience, I dream of the pleasant past when my boss was a man who ordered work to be done. My boss is now a woman and every day is a psychoanalysis session! Sigh!

I might mention, I haven't noticed it here, that many men say they couldn't have gotten where they were without their wives, or that their wives did all the promotion, galleries, paperwork, etc. I haven't seen any "success stories" in any magazine where a woman gives the same praise to her husband. Maybe I need a wife!

Robert, let me say thanks for placing up this topic. It was an eye opener of how many strong different opinions, attitudes & beliefs people have on it. I have truly looked into the hearts of many individuals by reading these comments. This topic of females becoming an ominous presence in the art world is all about a collective consciousness, belief systems and feelings towards a desired change in this world. Since the days of women`s suffrage, we have been trying to become equal to man. Who knows if a balance can be determined when so much anarchy exists. For right now, it's within yourself, man or woman, in your power to create as an artist or whatever creative skill you might have, so act on that, not worry about any injustices. I applaud the men on here who want to learn with women artists. I myself am grateful for all the learning I received from male artists. To focus on the inequalities will only keep them as a problem and not pave the way for a solution. Men & women were created to be different, that will never change. We need to embrace our uniqueness, keep learning from each other and co-exist. It might just be a never ending challenge from the looks on here. After speaking my part, I now must depart to paint and kick up the quality a notch. Evolution!

I am long past being surprised when women engage in overtly sexist portrayals of men. I am still, however, completely perplexed when men engage in the same. Even when men come to the defense of men - and there are fewer and fewer men willing to do so - they often reassert the same negative, sexist stereotypes of men as promoted by women.

Are we really so willing to accept the picture painted here?

Are we really unwilling to listen to anyone, male or female? That does not square with my experience, although there are certainly specific men and women that I will not likely lend an ear to again.

Are women really more likely to be “early adopters” than men? Again, that does not square with my experience.

Are women really “more into growth, self-improvement, networking and learning than men...”? (I will admit that I have little use for networking, but I know a lot of men who swear by it.)

Boys and men do not crave learning? There is plenty of research out there suggesting that the classroom environment favors girls and women over boys and men, but none that suggest that boys and men do not learn nor crave learning.

I’m sorry, but I just don’t buy it.

Unfortunately, it seems that a growing number of men have indeed bought it, and are now selling it. If we are in fact doomed as a gender, it is not because of what we are, but because of the lies that we are seemingly so willing to believe about ourselves.

Wow! Sgtaylor.....well said.