John Updike was a wise man and knew from where he spoke. When I give a public painting demonstration I’m always asked if I teach. I’m sure many artists have the same offer. I’m always flattered but usually answer in the negative.
No one can teach anyone to be a painter. One can be instructed in the techniques and methods of the painting process. From there it’s a self-exploratory road. Many think if they take lessons from a current master they will achieve some insight and thus move further up the chain to being an artist. All this is for naught and only enriches the coffers of the teacher.
As for self-doubt, this too is true. I was constantly challenged by the students to have all the answers and tell them the “secrets” to the process. When you tell them you don’t have answers except for maybe a technical response, the look on their faces would cause any teach to feel self-doubt. There is so much that is not tangible about painting that one has to find themselves on their own.
I did teach pastel years ago and I can say from personal experience that Updike was correct. It took an enormous amount of time to prepare a course that would be informative as well as challenging. I found it very time consuming. So much so that my work took back seat to the class.
I eventually realized I didn’t have all the answers. I had as many questions as the students.
After almost thirty years, I still have questions.
I jokingly once told my teach – “ skip the process and just tell me the secrets! “
As you paint day after day year after year you learn there are no secrets just hard work much ongoing effort and miles of canvas to be filled.

The Perks of Teaching
I teach for nine hours a day, twice a week and it really burns me out. I love it for the people I get to meet,the artistic relationships we build and the whole spectrum of styles and subjects we paint. It is a never ending learning process for myself and my students. After classes I cannot wait to get to my own work cause when teaching it seems the old process and or tricks of the trade that lay dormant pop up and pushes me to always out do the last canvas.

I'm not a teacher but am friendly with several teachers. Used to be I thought they had the greatest job - all those holidays - but on getting to know these friends they all told the same story just about. How tiring it was they said, almost in unison. I came to understand them and appreciate them so much more than I had. Recently, a new friend slipped temporarily back into the role she had previously given up when I was having trouble with a painting. Unknowing, I started leaning on her until she told me that she had been a teacher and found that she could not teach AND paint, that teaching sort of leached or sapped her, leaving her unable to paint for a while until she could regroup as it were. I'm a little dense sometimes, so thanks again for reminding me what a terrific debt of gratitude we owe to teachers and that we should never take that gift of theirs for granted.

I was surprised at how negative this post was. I have been teaching for 9 years, and I find that it has done nothing but enhance my art. As a teacher I am always exploring new themes, materials, and techniques to include in my curriculum. I learn much from my students, as they develop ideas I had not thought of. Self doubt is good. If you do not allow your beliefs to be challenged regularly, then how can you grow as an artist? Yes, teaching is exhausting, but if it is that draining for you, then teaching is not for you (which is fine.) To imply that teaching takes away from an artist's work seems a bit selfish to me, and sounds like a way to justify the fallacy of "...those who can't, teach."

I have been tutoring adults in oilpainting and watercolours for a few years now and find it an incredible uplifting experience. Yes there are times when I go home exhausted... but those times are far outweighed by the high I get when the lights come on in the students eyes.... and the penny drops. To see pupils grow in confidence as a person and an artist is special. I also find that sometimes students face problems in their painting 'that I haven't experienced before, and so we creatively problem solve. Fantastic when it all comes together successfully. As a teacher of art I am amazed how quickly the students become more, and friendships are formed. It also amazes me constantly how much impact we have on others lives, that we dont know about. I hope and pray that mine is all positive!
I have fellow artist friends that have great expertise and have gone down the path of tutoring, and their own work has either suffered or completely dried up. The ability to teach is a gift, I hope all teachers use wisely.

Teaching is a gift. Used in a positive way it is a blessing to the pupil, used in a negative way it can only cause damage. Some are able to impart knowledge and skills to students but tutors who cannot are a complete waste of time and money, and are likely to cause more harm than good, and put people off. I am sure you all have had a teacher like this in your life. People like that you learn in spite, of not because of.

Well written and thought out and so true! I believe we learn more by teaching than we could have learned in a classroom. Art is an everlearning process - the more you learn, the more you know you need to learn.

I agree with "Esoterica". I am a teacher of fine art in my home studio for mostly home school students, but also public school and adult students. I have a time frame for teaching - Sept - March. The rest of the months I devote to painting and creating. I am inspired by my students. And yes, it thrills me to see their growth each year. Since I start at the beginning, drawing, and take them as far as they want to go. Most of my students will continue for a five year period. I have seen some great artists spring forth, but not only that, I see what has happened to them personally as they have grown in confidence and self-esteem. I believe Art and Music are so important in the learning process for children and adults. I appreciated very much this letter today and it is so true that you expend a lot of energy teaching, that is why I do not try to mix the two. When I teach, I teach! When I paint! I paint! It seems to work for me. Love these letters that I receive every week.

I had a 'class' last night. There are 5 retired teachers in it and 2 others enrolled. As a painter, I make no excuses for not being a teacher. I tell them I am an enabler. I can only show you how you can use the tools and ways to see. If you don't draw a half an hour a day you won't get better. Doing the work is up to you. Practice is the only way to get better.
Artists who teach or enable others to see are important ambassadors of art. They open the doors for others to step in and express themselves through the mechanisms of art. Even if these folks never get back to a sketch book, the will go to a gallery with a better appreciation of the value and labor of art. The student can't help but 'see' better for taking time to explore art. It's all good. Art need appreciators. It's a two way street."

You've done it 'agenn', Robert Genn. You have read my mind perfectly. I am now a full time artist and loving it, after spending nearly 10 years out of retirement from teaching art (which I did for 20 years). I had to re-invent myself. It felt like I had to un-learn everything I had taught and was taught. You wrote a letter on Voluntary Mutism - Feb. 4, 2005, touching on much the same thing as today, which again made me feel like I was normal as I often wondered what was wrong with me and why I could not paint the way I wanted to whilst teaching. Your article helped me focus for my solo exhibition in April of that year. Thanks again for touching on a subject that is too often overlooked or misunderstood.

It is interesting to hear a couple of differnt sides of teaching. I am now getting certified to teach art in Connecticut public schools at 60 years old. Part of it is to develope something I can do over the next 10 years if necessary that doesn't involve lots of physical labor. I do really believe that the giving that is involved in teaching is so important-I learn as much as any student does and it is a good feeling to see the "lights" go on. I always think of one of my heros in art- Hans Hofman, who was a magnificent teacher AND artist. Its in the eye of the beholder still!5

There is nothing negative about this RG letter. It succinctly covers the joys and pitfalls of the very tricky business of teaching.

How true, how true... When I began studying to be a singer, I knew that I wanted to perform, not teach, but eventually, I was wooed by the sirens of steady income and stability to open a teaching studio. I experienced all those "charms" you mention, watching my methods make a difference to my students, but oh, how it wore me out creatively. No time now to study for my own singing...all my energies were directed to preparing my students to do theirs. I lasted exactly one year before "rebelling" and going back to my own study and performance.

I found teaching to be a fascinating experience and one observation occured to me. Through teaching I myself learned so much. Preparing classes and answering questions really kept me aware (or even revealed to me) what I was thinking.
However I also discovered voluntary mutism, and I realized that the more I talked about ideas the less I made them into art. So now, I do almost no teaching and little talking and my art seems stronger, more intuitive and more compelling. I now try to keep it on a level below speech and analysis-at least until AFTER the fact. When I can do that and see myself as a conduit rather than an originator the work is much more powerful.

Teaching does suck you dry at times but for some reason I keep coming back. I learn far more from my students then they learn from me. Another benefit is that I have to explain myself. Hard to do sometimes but I learn not only what to communicate but how to communicate. I have grown as an artist and a person by teaching and I'm thankful that I have the opportunity to do so.

...Lifetime teacher..first in a private elementery school...which I TOTALLY enjoyed for approx 5 years...followed by teaching in my private studio, where I teach children 3 days a week for 2 hrs each session, and adults including high school folks ..2 ,2hr classes each week
An old fashioned axiom taught to me by my teachers of "returning your talent to God through sharing it with others"....has been the modus operendi
I prefer the term FACSILITATE to the term... TEACH
I like to think I am a good fascilitator.. I keep it light and fun and PRESERVE the individuality ot the student
Does it deplete me?...sometimes when I allow the student to depend too much.
Thank you for this letter Robert ....I am currently thinking of transitioning to website exposure and in a few years a smaller studio, concentrating on artwork exclusively
Your letter and these responses were truly food for thought.
CHEERS, Gail, NY

Today I found out (online) that Fred Leach AWS DF has passed on. Over the past ten years I have lost touch with him (we moved from Ohio to Texas). I am truly sad, he was a most generous teacher, and a master artist. I owe him my artistic eye, and I have had gallery owners say they could see Fred's work in some of early paintings.

I studied under him for over 6 years (we even had some some classes in our garage). I have several of his originals - at one point I wanted him to do a book with his work.

I thank God for what Fred gave me and the world with his art...Joyce

Here is one of Fred's works.

As recently published in a study from Harvard Medical School (and as I have said for decades) not only can art be taught, but it can be learned! It takes a really good teacher, and an attentive student; the better the teacher is as an artist, the better the learning. Just manipulation of materials will not an art work make, as art will always require the "art spirit". That spirit is not often readily available with "teachers" who grind through a class for whatever their reasoning it is to grind. They may not have the luxury of choosing their students or courses, which could damage their art spirit.

In my classes, we work from observation. I have found out that :

I get burned out making art UNLESS I teach. I teach kids, mostly, and they are very eager to do well, willing to learn/observe, and I often paint with them after they are well into their basics.
I use the teaching time as a practice, and I am SURE to get in the variations in my practice of drawing. I also do a thumbnail for each student to see "how it goes".

I must admit that if I teach too much for me, I am pooped out, but in a happy and enriched way. It tends to make me stronger now; (but in the beginning years, I got into a bad place where I could only draw as example and not from myself due to most of my practice being at teaching).

Teaching adults is harder; they don't pay attention as well, fight every step, and think they have a right to argue, albeit in "question" form. So they have to be won over often times, which can be tiring. They are better left to the demo classes where they just take what they can get from the demo.

From reading all the above responses several things become clear to me.
1- Teaching is hard, time consuming and exhausting
2- "Seeing the lights go off the thier eyes" ..IS rewarding.
3- Little personal (teachers) work gets done.
4- Art can be taught (sic. only the technical, not the spiritual)

I wonder about those who teach full time, if they also have a viable thriving career as an artist?
If one is to teach and be good at it, it will and should take ALL your time. Which leaves little to no time for personal work.
I agree that there are good teachers, but few if any can devote what time is left time to advancing their own work. IF they think they are they are kidding themselves.
If one is really going to "teach" full time, then one will put; should put their own career on hold. Otherwise, you are just performing a the "job" of teaching and not inspiring their students.
There comes a time in every teachers life who decides its time to do your own work when teaching will either stop or be put on the back burner. Or else your doing it just for the money.

I have known so many artists who have turned to teaching mainly as a way to pay the bills and still work with what they love. Some of them contiue to make beautiful paintings, but others seem to lose part of their creative power. I have been asked occassionally to teach, and I have avoided it. Even though I am retired from another profession and somewhat financially secure, I sometimes feel the need to teach in order to pay for my artistic habits. Certainly my sales have not covered the expenses. I think many of the artists I and others admire gain their livelihood more from teaching than from sales of their work.

I wonder if teaching take more out of some of them than trying to distribute their work through galleries. I have found the latter to be a difficult and draining process, and having to both teach and market while still working to improve our skills might be very hard on some of us.

I appreciate your comments Robert, as well as those of the other contributers on this highly relevant topic. I think we each have to choose carefully our own path. One thing that worries me is that I think we need some time for other things, whether it be travel, writing, reading,sports or whatever.

So far I have done some demonstrations and I am still open to the teaching route. One of the benefits is the recognition and praise I have received from people who seem to appreciate my demonstrations, but this could in the long run become a distraction.

Art seems to me a lonely profession, but it has been a pleasant change for me. Formerly I was an attorney, and it involves dealing with the problems of others and with many people, who are often not at their best. I don't know if I am ready to go back to the schedules set by others.

Anyway thnks to all who have commented.

Updike's 4 years were enough, where and who would he have been without instruction...The idea of teaching I believe is a calling. Certain people are designed to teach what they know (technically). Instructors can bring everything possible to the student, it is what the student does with the information that really shows results. I have re-read the 10 rules you wrote about recently and it seems teaching is more of a symbiotic relationship than anything else. I teach Developmentally Disabled adults painting twice a week, and frankly I walk away from class wih much more than I taught. This particular population is brilliant, creative and in many cases exceptional with little or any instruction. Perhaps we as the sudent require the message of producing art to be translated by teachers.. Thank you Robert for another great topic to think about....

For me I cannot do both, maybe some artists can.

I gave up teaching adults (advanced students were the most rewarding), maybe 5 years ago.

Rick Rotante is absolutely correct in his last post.

But if you have the calling for teaching and need steady money, I would recommend it over being a waitress, or selling too cheap.

Another artist shared this link with me about sales, it may interest some of you. Joyce

http://ca.video.yahoo.com/watch/3800266/10410861

I am a teacher. I have recently moved into a smaller house with out a studio and have debated on whether or not to try to continue painting and teaching. My friend Stephen Quiller reminded me that artists need to be painting for "one paints for that beautiful timeless state and interaction with the process and that is what we live for." It is the same with teaching and so i will do my best to continue to do both. Thank you for you thoughts on the subject. JoRene

My grandfather taught full-time in vocational school, taught at night and Saturdays in his studio (a restored carriage house in our backyard) and still managed to paint, draw, print, carve, build to his heart's desire. Okay, maybe "heart's desire" was a little over the top. Of course, I can't not mention my grandmother's role in making this possible for him to do. With 6 kids of their own and then grandchildren (me!) running around, it couldn't have been an easy task. We all knew not to bother Pop when he was painting. Quiet observation, though, was always encouraged. And as we got a little older, questions about the process. Pop was and IS a great teacher. At 86, he still has a few weekly students including me. For some people, like my Pop, that's what it's about; teaching and learning, learning and teaching.

I have taught, and it surely depletes one's energy. I am thinking of doing it again though, because of one painting I did that makes others ask "how did you DO that?" It's kind of a karma thing - to give something back, so I may do it, even though I am exhausted by the end of the day. It might be worth it.

I am a student in an accredited art school with a wide reputation. Several of my instructors are simply "burned out." While they are wonderful people and excellent artists, they seem to live in a fantasy world of occasional group shows, occasional foundation purchases where their work goes to languish in some government basement, or faculty shows within the institution itself. I came to art school to learn how to be a self supporting artist and I don't want to be an art teacher. I'm wondering if I am being shown the way by the wrong kind of teacher. Please tell me that my art school experience is not typical.

Teaching is a different experience for everyone who does it. I have maintained a working studio in the South End of Boston for three years. About two years ago I decided to offer a one day painting workshop a month to help pay the studio rent. This seed of an idea with a handful of students turned into teaching twice a month with a list now of over 200 students. I have found I love teaching, that I am good at it, and the reward well worth it. To share what I love to do with others is a wonderful way to "give back". I feel I have struck a good balance between time for my own work and teaching just twice a month. This past Spring, serendipity got me an article in the Summer issue of American Artist magazine! Rather than describe more about my teaching/workshops to you here, I'd love for you to you read the article. You may visit my site where there is a link to the article. Also, I believe the article is still on the American Artist Workshop site.

Thank you for sharing your insights on teaching, and for your reference to John Updike. I humbly believe he is an author with an incredible insight into the human condition in the finest of detail. Your discussion leads to the question is this an outcome we want from our educational system. Shouldn't it energize its contributors to the process? Your discussion really gets at the core of a key element to society's well being. There is quality profit in a well educated society, and I applaud your discussion topic.

As a teaching artist and a professional artist, I have noticed that there are different styles of teaching, just as there are different reasons for teaching. Those of us who 'teach' because we are natural born exhorters (encourage and correct) and do 'art' because we must (I will often teach a full eight- to ten-hour day and work another five to ten hours on my own art), may experience exhaustion as a result of teaching. But, not depletion! Indeed, I have often found the opposite to be true: the success (or challenge) that my students have in a class often energizes me! Whether to experiment further or revisit a technique or medium already tried, motivation often comes from the 'sharing' of creative energies of teacher and pupil. Perhaps a simple change in the way we view the task of teaching -seeing it as an opportunity, as a 'gift', as opposed to seeing it as a 'chore', or a means to an end (money)- might benefit all of us involved in art with others.

As to whether or not 'teaching' increases self-doubt, I believe on occasion everyone experiences self-doubt-whether they are involved in art or rocket science or truck driving. I have also found the opposite to be true in this- the act of teaching art has strengthened my belief in my own art. Learning more about Art History and the derision inflicted upon past artists should give us all a basis for determining whether our self-doubt (or the criticism of others) is baseless or not or whether such negativity is simply a matter of personal taste or the 'fashion of the day'.

Crazy!! Without teachers... we wouldn't know what we know today!! Not only is teaching a great pleasure but it is a responsibility if we want to keep each other informed, and our profession alive.

Two mornings a week I run an art class at the Correctional Center nearby in South Burlington Vermont. Often I feel like it's the most sane thing I do all week. I am aware that some of the students are coming to class merely to get out of their unit for the two hours. Many of the students are completely untutored in the fine arts. All have the problem of too much creativity and no proper outlet. There's nothing much more satisfying than to watch an inmate who is a bit "resistant" become a star student. And if that student is a headache to others in the facility, it's even more of a kick. What does this tell me? Not so much that my teaching is anything close to stellar; rather, that art let's the humanity emerge.

I like to think that if I was independently wealthy, I would still be doing the same thing. I get a lot out of it -- not only the satisfaction of helping others, but also the chance to work out my own ideas. Would I still do it if I didn't need the money? I honestly don't know.

Whether we are teaching very basic skills (the ones from which we spring and to where we come home in times of self-doubt and rejuvenation - like composition and perspective, like music theory and vocal placement, like grammar and the elements of style) or we are exploring new territory with our students on the grand and glorious road to improving our craft ... it is up to the individual to find true inspiration. Teachers of all kinds (parents and mentors included) find the challenge of inspiration sometimes falls by the wayside when we are not bringing inspired energy into our "classroom". Sir Ken Robinson (author of Out of Our Minds: Learning to be Creative) says we are "...educating creativity out of our students." There are a plethora of reasons. Those of us who have had the privilege of teaching what we have learned, realize that the best teaching experience is reciprocal; It is much not like the D.I.R/Floor method of teaching autistic children where the point is to go with the interests & passions of the child and use them as the vehicle/as the metaphor to teach what will be beneficial to the student.

When we are teaching, we have made the choice to share and to place our focus on others ... not on the self. The gift for a true teacher is what he learns in this process. We enhance who we are when we get past ourselves and our own gain, in order to teach others. As is true for each of us, there is a time to be the teacher and there is a time to be the student. The optimum experience is when they happen simultaneously!

Good teaching of any kind requires that the teacher be genuine, and stand as an individual before their students. This is something I have strived for throughout my teaching career. When I started to teach watercolour classes, this became true in a very personal way. Gifts come in surprising packages. One of these gifts walked right into my studio.

I have found myself challenged by many students' needs, but by one student in particular. She got into my psyche and banged on some locked doors I didn't even know I had under lock and key. She was honest and demanding about the kind of work she wanted to do - wild, expressive, and unconventional. At first I felt threatened by her demands, feeling like I had a responsibility to change how she was feeling. This 'gift' wasn't feeling like a gift at all, just something I wanted to return. Then I realized it was me hearing my own voice in her words. Even though I knew on many levels I was honest with how I painted and what I wanted to express, my need to provide her with ways of finding what she was looking for forced me out of my own comfortable places - those safety zones where we linger too long. The zones that kept me still in my own work started to bare themselves and glare at me like an old armchair that suddenly doesn't feel welcoming anymore. My need to challenge her and to invite her into the nourishingly dangerous and thrilling world of pushing the boundaries of comfort in one's artistic work grabbed me around the neck and shook the protective breath out of me. I found myself gasping for new air; trying to find for myself what she hunted for in herself. Teaching had aligned me with a deeper sense of who I wanted to be as an artist. I think I travelled further and deeper because of those challenges.

My own need to be ethically present in the company of those I teach has kept me closer to the truth of who I want to be as an artist. I am so thankful that this student got under my skin. It loosened the old covering and helped me shed those parts of my artistic self that were not growing with the rest of me.

I was a teacher of Art to Elementary aged children for quite a few years. Contrary to what John Updike experienced (from College aged Students) it was a spur to my creativity. It WAS FUN to see the children find their confidence, and realize that they were able to "CREATE" (make something from "nothing", as a 5th grader told me).

I found that I saw the world in a different way and it sparked my creativity. I gave them responsibility for their own actions, encouraged them to help others, entered their work in contests to boost self-esteem, and had FUN!!! So did they.

"Art is a doing thing. It favours self-discovery and process while eschewing words and theory. It thrives on silence and contemplation." I don't know about the contemplation--for me that usually comes afterwards--but the rest of it is right on. When I'm asked to speak to students it's always hard to know how much truth they can handle. Of course it's just my own truth, but that's my point. It seems ungrateful, after they asked me to speak, to tell them that the only things worth knowing for an artist are his or her own discoveries, not mine or anybody else's.

It seems counter intuitive to tell a student, who is there to learn things, that in creativity forgetting is more important than remembering. To for-get, to un-get, is to unconceive, to leave the womb of the mind/body empty and ready for the next image to wiggle in and take root. Of course I'm exaggerating to make the point, but I really do have feel like I'm learning to paint all over again with each painting. Otherwise the thing doesn't come to life and is stillborn. Image making is re-membering: putting the parts back together again in a new way. How do you teach somebody that? They've paid good money to be there, and here comes some unschooled weirdo telling them they can't be taught to be artists and shouldn't be there. And it they do learn something from me, God forbid, then my thesis goes south. So yes, I can see how teaching could make me doubt myself.

Then again, is there any artist who does not doubt himself? Make that, any human being.

I am an artist first, but began teaching about 6 yrs ago. After a summer hiatus, I began teaching about a month ago again. I have become aware of the draining effect. Not only am I physically exhausted but creatively, it is just not there. I have been painting and creating all of my life and never been at a loss for inspiration. My classes are always full usually with a waiting list. My students say I am the best teacher they’ve ever had, and I am now wondering how a person who is supposedly so good at what they do, doesn’t really enjoy doing it?! I have a couple of galleries that represent me and have had quite a bit of success in the past,but this year sales have been pretty dismal, ergo, the need for teaching. I have also been heavily doubting my abilities all of a sudden! What a mess! After literally doing hundreds of demos, I have such trepidation now. I was truly relieved to read this today and now understand the origins of my predicament.

After 13 years of teaching elementary art, I took a 2 year break to paint. My teaching years had left me feeling completely drained of energy. My plan was to not teach anymore, but I have been unable to acquire income in any other manner. I am now, therefore, in my 14th year of teaching elementary art. It's better for me now because I did have two years off to paint and for one other huge reason: I give up. I'm not a painter, I'm a teacher. I devote myself to the classroom now, and I don't go into my studio very often. While I accept my limitations, there is a big part of me that morns for the loss of my dream of being an artist. Trying to do both is too exhausting for me. BRAVO to those who can accomplish that. I appreciate this letter because it confirms that it really is a struggle, and that it's not just me and my own weakness. I do find joy in teaching art to children and I am now focusing on trying to bring energy in from my students, rather than just give it out. I'm two months into my fourteenth year and enjoying it more than I ever did. However, as I walk past my studio at home each day, I look inside and see my unfinished work and my unused materials, I dream of a time when I can be active in there again.

If Teacher Mind is knowing too much, I suspect that I only have Beginner Mind. Teaching has made me realize how much I do not know. Maybe this is what Mr. Updike meant when he said that teaching makes you doubt yourself? For example, standing in front of students and trying to explain the concept of imprimatura, methods and history, I suddenly realize with terror the immense gaps in my knowledge base. Sure, I can show them a few different ways to put an imprimatura down, and talk a little about why it is a useful practice, but one could write a book on the subject! I only know a little bit! Why did I think I could lecture on this extensive topic? Then there is also the struggle of finding ways to clearly communicate things which you know instinctively, but have never put into words before.

So, yes, I agree with what I think Mr. Updike was saying: that teaching can be very humbling. And it is surely exhausting. Lots of restorative cups of tea are needed after a class! Teaching is both an honor and a challenge. It is exciting, emotionally rewarding, and as a bonus, highly instructive for the instructor.

"...creative energy requires blind energy and focused ignorance..." Are you kidding me! This is a quote from the sorry ass likes of John Updike? Question, what could he ever hope to know about being an artist? I am so glad to hear that someone has solved the equation of what it is to "be" in this world. While at some point I hope to get to that conclusion myself (probably on the day I leave this earth), I would rather be where I am today and just being an artist. What I do, I do for pleasure and there is some voice in me that needs to come through. I agonize about my work and paint everyday. But it is also something I am good at and I have sacrificed my life to be an artist. I come from a family of brokers and business people. I also believe that to be a true artist is to teach. It is only when we give back that we come full circle. Then at the end of this diatribe John Updike say's "I still had a lot to learn, but had been given the liberating notion that now I could teach myself." Isn't that more something like "Gosh darn it, my publisher is paying me umteen-bizzillion dollars for yet another book I have yet to think about, I better get busy!"...
My paints are calling me.

A great topic. I tend to agree with Updike. I am lucky that while I teach (22 contact hours weekly) and have taught for 16 years, I do not teach art. Teaching English gives me the emotional upper of watching and helping mostly young people expand their knowledge, awareness and ability but it does not sap that part of my energy which goes to art. In fact I crave non-verbal activity after teaching. Teaching language does take away from my own reading and expansion. I just get to the point where I want to scream, "No more words.." Therefore I can see where Updike's complaint originates.

Teaching is impossible. When I train Czech teachers of English, who are locked into 19th century German teaching methods, I try to beat in this concept. No one can teach, BUT people can certainly learn and a good 'teacher' can certainly aid and guide this process. Technique (grammar) is part of it but the support of 'error' is essential. I once knew, for a short time, a wonderful lady who avered that we only learn through our mistakes. There is much to be said for this concept. Teachers (classes) give a safe haven for making mistakes, i.e. for experimentation. For the teacher who complains about the questions of his adult students - turn it around, give your students the questions. I am convinced that the root of education is questioning.

Teaching does aid in building links to real life; people and activities out of the studio. Teaching also gives me my sense of returning my own fantastic educational opportunities to the community. I was never able to teach in the States and here I have the opportunity to reach a wide international community; Arabians, Sudanese, Kaziks, Turks, Slovaks, Czechs, Belorussians and so on. I am able to bring my life as an artist and historian to the classroom full of prospective businesspeople. Often the very concept that art is more than HOBBY is revolutionary.

There is one other complication. I attack each lesson as if it was a piece of art; a striving for unreachable wholeness and perfection. That takes time and energy. On the other hand though I am old enough to be my students' grandfather, I do not have time to get old.

I taught art on the university level for 36 years. Though it took "a lot of time" as Mr. Updike states, it was also one of the greatest teaching experiences for me, the teacher. As a result, I know considerable more about art and its history and the 'making' of it than I would have not teaching. True, it "makes you doubt yourself", but doubt is part of the territory. It is what keeps you sharp and working to find what and how to teach. The 'trick' is to accept that you will never truly know everything. And, if you are committed, honest, and serious about your efforts you will always learn about how to do it better.

Another great thing about teaching is that you learn to find words for explaining something which is essentially a mystery. What goes into the making of a work of art and how the solutions arrive is impossible to fully explain using words. The visual world, the realm of the artist, is wordless and silent. But, in the course of attempting to find how to teach and communicate this mystery, you learn a lot.

Mr. Updike talks about "teaching yourself". That is something artists do everyday in the studio, and that is what you also do when you teach. There are books about how to teach and how to paint a painting, but essentially you teach yourselves.

As for teaching taking a lot of energy. It does do that. During my early years of teaching I found myself, as you state, "exhausted"! But, the longer I taught the more focused I became in the classroom, the less fatigued I was at the end of the day. And, as a result I had plenty of energy to spend an evening in the studio. My basic conclusion is that the more focused you are on a task, the less energy depleting it is.

There is something to the magic of gestation, that is not letting out all the mystery perhaps by teaching or talking, and allowing it to come through the process of creativity anew. I think it takes a certain person or practice to not give all one’s energy away while teaching. I agree with John Updike that we learn through education, that ultimately we can teach ourselves. Education mostly trains us how to learn and what we each need to learn. It is the discipline and relationship with self that can develop in a class. It does help to expose us to ways of doing things, especially techniques. It offers practical information and the possibility for collaborative creativity. Yet for most fine artists and spiritual students, it is the time alone that allows the fire to burn and for originality to birth. Exposure to the work of others may inspire, but it should not be used to compare with one’s own gifts, for that would stifle the process of originality. We cannot foresee that which has not yet been created, therefore we need to build a strong connection with inner, essential potential and learn how we each manifest creative impulses. The thrill of creating something with a vitality of its own, will bring us back to the studio again and again. This is what we must learn on our own. No one can really tell you how that will be for you or how to get to that zone. But they can tell you there is a zone to discover.

I teach and love it so. And you are so right about the look in your students eyes when they get it. There is nothing more gratifying that seeing that! You can tell the instant it happens just by their body language alone! I get just as excited as they do I swear! I teach decorative arts and we have seen our student numbers go down and down over the last few years. But we hang in there. I cannot imagine never teaching again, it would take out a piece of my soul I believe. My mother was a gifted artist and teacher and I saw the wonder of the student teacher relationship unfold before me at an early age and wanted that for myself and my students.

I taught information science at a graduate level at a major international university for over 20 years. Not a class went by when I did not come out of the classroom or lab knowing a different world than the one I went into class with. Always knew how to do it better next time. Unfortunately it took so much energy, I could only dream of my first love, oil painting. Now I spend all that energy in ART, but think so wonderfully of the years teaching and all the marvelous students I had and how they are now changing theirs and others worlds. The most rewarding human activity!!

I teach watercolor where we had a great tragedy on our campus and we are not alone. My teaching has become better I think and my art is changing. I have always assumed that nature was my teacher when I really needed help. But just now I agree with John Updike. Being a giving teacher, I am convinced that my well of knowledge is filled when my student’s new wells quietly replenish mine underground. Mother Nature, being an angry old woman right now, is not cooperating. I even thought global warming must be menopausal. Am I not honoring my teacher enough as well? Who is my teacher when I need help?

Lately I've discovered that I have a passion to teach, write and communicate... much more so than just painting. While I adore the process of painting, my personality craves social interaction, be it online or face-to-face. I prefer the online version because I can pretend that I'm tall and have a great speaking voice. In reality, I'm short and have a high, squeaky voice. But with words, I can pass on what I know and encourage other artists. I love that!

While some artists (where art is the true passion of their life) are dragged down by teaching, others are natural born teachers... where teaching becomes their artistic outlet. However, in order to be a decent teacher, you must have experienced how it is to make great artwork. So, in reality, teachers have to be good artists, able to communicate, and want to see other artists grow.

I don't think any artist should teach just for the money. It'll make them worse at their art, insecure - as you suggest - and sometimes downright miserable.

Wonder and passion lose their power through dissection. Breaking the elements down and codifying them into various responses can be deadly. It is important for artists and writers, dancers alike, to keep their passion in check. Disenchantment is an unfortunate threat...but not an inevitable one.

There is not as much difference between the two processes as you might think. Teaching and creating art can coexist and enhance each other. In both disciplines, the muse moves you as the teacher/artist makes new discoveries, one solitary and one with others. Good teaching is about bringing out creativity through a sharing, and an exchange of ideas. Teaching techniques and principles only provide a "toolbox" for the students, and serves to reinforce the artists own skills. The teacher can "work" on his own art as he engages his students.
To paint by oneself for hours and hours in a lonely studio is not as appealing as being around young creative people. There is time for both, and they both can stimulate the "artist life".

Some of us are more or less extrovert and tend to be energised by people and some of us more or less introvert and have a need to be energised by taking some time alone and to complicate things further we’re a mixture of these and all different as is apparent from the diversity of comments on this topic.
‘The teacher finds out what she thinks by hearing what she has to say’ These words sound to me like those of an extrovert, ‘It (art) thrives on silence and contemplation.’ sound more those of an introvert. In addition to that in teaching as in life some people tend to drain ones energy whereas others energise.
Taking these observations into account the relationship between teaching and creating art deserves ongoing monitoring so thanks to both Robert and other posters for giving me so much to think about.

Wow! What you had to say about teaching was like a slap in the face - it brought me to a "Duh!" moment when I considered the adverse effects you mentioned. I had considered teaching recently, with a thought of just how much I like influencing and stimulating students or even other artists. This has come about at the odd time while showing my work and talking with my audience - some of these people seem to come away very inspired - almost like they can't wait to get home and start working - it's quite a feeling to bring this out in someone.

Although I wouldn't expect quite the same "aha!" reaction while teaching, day to day, the idea of imparting good stimulating stuff was on my mind. But you are right - even though I might be able to summon up great amounts of energy to teach, there would be very little left over to do my work. S'pose I was thinking somehow that one inspires the other. That just can't be true - well, at least not for me. Chances are it's the student benefiting far more than the teacher.

Thanks for the insight - as for the doubting thing - I do enough of that in my daily work... I'd like to keep it, but only as a self-generated kind of doubt.

While I found teaching to be exhausting, I also found that it constantly reinforced just how much I do know about painting and how much I have to give. I think like all other worthwhile endeavors, moderation is the key. When I only devote one day a week to teaching, I find that my work is usually better because I have thought about all the "right" things to do in my painting. And critiquing a whole class of students makes me more aware of a mistake in my own work when I make one. I also find that one day does not exhaust my creative spirit.

About teaching...
For art to have a solid foundation, there are basically two "places" it really needs to come "from"....that of intelligent decisions, but also that "from the heart" ... emotions! I do believe, without either, the final expression can either be pretty "empty" or pretty "cold".


The thing I found about teaching, because the "process" is so much from the right brain...but the creative experience is from the left brain...when I teach, it helps me ground my thoughts so that I CAN UNDERSTAND that which I have discovered, and thus thru teaching, I become a better painter myself!!!

BECAUSE HAVING to put it into words, to explain to someone else, it also lays things out for me to understand!!! This may sound like some insane person is writing this,
BUT, to learn, to become good at what one does... one must have FACTS, not merely FEELINGS! If it were only for feelings, then even the neighborhood cat could be called an artist!!!

ALSO with facts and understanding, gives an artist freedom...freedom to discover the weakness in their work, and solve it...otherwise one would end up with so many “unfinished messes”. Understanding brings strength and power to any body of work!

BUT teaching also requires reaching out to a student, while giving them the foundation, also helping them realize, that within them is a special voice, a voice that no one else in the world has ever had, or will again...it is for the teacher to nurture this specialness, and not over power it with what the teacher “thinks” is important, in the final expression!!

So, to me a teachers place is not only to open new insight and physical knowledge to those who are studying, but also to see the specialness any one person might have, and nurture that, and have the student become aware of their own unique voice!!